Army Orders Soldiers to Shed Dragon Skin or Lose SGLI Death Benefits
Excerpts by Nathaniel R. Helms - Soldiers for the Truth. Saturday 14 January 2006
Two deploying soldiers and a concerned mother reported Friday afternoon that the US Army appears to be singling out soldiers who have purchased Pinnacle's Dragon Skin Body Armor for special treatment. The soldiers, who are currently staging for combat operations from a secret location, reported that their commander told them if they were wearing Pinnacle Dragon Skin and were killed their beneficiaries might not receive the death benefits from their $400,000 SGLI life insurance policies. The soldiers were ordered to leave their privately purchased body armor at home or face the possibility of both losing their life insurance benefit and facing disciplinary action.
The soldiers asked for anonymity because they are concerned they will face retaliation for going public with the Army's apparently new directive. At the sources' requests DefenseWatch has also agreed not to reveal the unit at which the incident occurred for operational security reasons. On Saturday morning a soldier affected by the order reported to DefenseWatch that the directive specified that "all" commercially available body armor was prohibited. The soldier said the order came down Friday morning from Headquarters, United States Special Operations Command (HQ, USSOCOM), located at MacDill Air Force Base, Florida. It arrived unexpectedly while his unit was preparing to deploy on combat operations. The soldier said the order was deeply disturbing to many of the men who had used their own money to purchase Dragon Skin because it will affect both their mobility and ballistic protection. "We have to be able to move. It (Dragon Skin) is heavy, but it is made so we have mobility and the best ballistic protection out there. This is crazy. And they are threatening us with our benefits if we don't comply." he said.
Recently Dragon Skin became an item of contention between proponents of the Interceptor OTV body armor generally issued to all service members deploying in combat theaters and its growing legion of critics. Critics of the Interceptor OTV system say it is ineffective and inferior to Dragon Skin, as well as several other commercially available body armor systems on the market. Last week DefenseWatch released a secret Marine Corps report that determined that 80% of the 401 Marines killed in Iraq between April 2004 and June 2005 might have been saved if the Interceptor OTV body armor they were wearing was more effective. The Army has declined to comment on the report because doing so could aid the enemy, an Army spokesman has repeatedly said.
Yesterday the DoD released a news story through the Armed Forces News Service that quoted Maj. Gen. Steven Speaks, the Army's director of force development, who countered critical media reports by denying that the US military is behind the curve in providing appropriate force protection gear for troops deployed to Iraq and elsewhere in the global war against terrorism. The effort to improve body armor "has been a programmatic effort in the case of the Army that has gone on with great intensity for the last five months," he noted. Speaks' assessment contradicts earlier Army, Marine and DoD statements that indicated as late as last week that the Army was certain there was nothing wrong with Interceptor OTV body armor and that it was and remains the "best body armor in the world."
One of the soldiers who lost his coveted Dragon Skin is a veteran operator. He reported that his commander expressed deep regret upon issuing his orders directing him to leave his Dragon Skin body armor behind. The commander reportedly told his subordinates that he "had no choice because the orders came from very high up" and had to be enforced, the soldier said. Another soldier's story was corroborated by his mother, who helped defray the $6,000 cost of buying the Dragon Skin, she said. The mother of the soldier, who hails from the Providence, Rhode Island area, said she helped pay for the Dragon Skin as a Christmas present because her son told her it was "so much better" than the Interceptor OTV they expected to be issued when arriving in country for a combat tour. "He didn't want to use that other stuff," she said. "He told me that if anything happened to him I am supposed to raise hell."
6 comments:
OMG!! What is the logic behind this? I'm making a huge assumption here that there is any logic in our government's actions, I know, but, c'mon! I'd wear the better armor and tell them to screw the benefits. I'd rather have a better shot at living through any attact.
I know. Incredible isn't it? All I can think of is that some bureaucratic REMF made a blanket decision or someone is worried about the legal ramifications if someone gets killed in 'non-standard' equipment.... or maybe they're worried over the contract for the Army approved body armour. Either way.. it stinks.
I'm not exactly the wars biggest fan - but if you're going to send men & women to potentially die for your country.. at least give them the best equipment money can buy.
VV and CK,
I agree with you both. Chicken-hawk idealogues in Washington are sending these kids to die. Kids whose only sin is that they believe in their country. And the Bushes, Cheneys, Perles, Wolfowitzes, Rumsfelds, etc. of the world take advantage of that.
Bradblog has an interesting post showing that this administration is not only abandoning the troops over there but also when they get home:
COST OF WAR: Suicide Isn't Painless...
I was talking to someone else about this and here's the theory about the logic of all this. The government contracts for the armor. Usually it goes to the lowest bidder or a cronie of someone in government. Suffice it to say, it's not about supplying the best armor for our personnel. So you have some people in the military forking over the big bucks for the best armor available. They go into battle with their unit, they are attacked and you have soldiers receiving identical attacks/wounds. The ones in the privately purchased armor survive, the ones in the government issued armor die or are horribly maimed. This makes for great media coverage, people pay attention, and heads roll in Washington. There goes what little support they have left for this ridiculous war. What do you think?
V V... That's cynical enough to be true.... I wonder if we'll find out some day?
Hopefully we will, but not at the expense of anymore lives. Maybe some paperwork will surface about this.
Post a Comment