About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Sunday, February 12, 2006

Why does Religion exist?

This question has perplexed me for some time. I understand why individuals have religious feelings and beliefs, various though they are, but why does the concept of religion exist? I’m not thinking of any particular religion or belief system here, after all many forms of religious worship have existed from the present back to well before any historical records began. Indeed archaeologists and anthropologists have pointed to the apparently religious burials of our near relative Homo Sapiens Neanderthalis which indicated a belief in an afterlife.

Some kind of religious observance has probably been going on then for approximately 2 million years and has covered every part of the globe. Why? What is it about the human condition that leads (seemingly inevitably) to a religious response? It would need to be something universal, free of historical, geographical or cultural reference and yet be something uniquely human – as it seems evident that no other creature on Earth practices religion. So, what do we all have in common?

We are all human so we all have universal experiences - birth, growth, death and much besides. But I don’t think that’s enough to explain why so many people have believed in external supernatural forces, gods, demons and versions of an afterlife. I think the thing we all have in common, that is central to who we are and how we think of our place in the universe is that we are all self-aware. We are not only alive, but we know we are alive. We know we exist. That makes us different from the majority of other life forms on the planet. I hesitate to say that we alone have this faculty but I do think it is one of our defining traits.

So why is being self aware so important and how does it lead to religion? Self awareness probably emerged sometime over the last 2 million years as a result of the increasing complexity of the brain. It probably wasn’t like a simple on/off switch but was more likely linked to brain complexity. The more complex the brain, the more self aware the ‘owner’ of that brain was – until at some point in prehistory we, as a species, became aware all of the time. I think that any self-aware being will inevitably ask itself two fundamental questions: Why am I/We here and What happens when I die. Because consciousness feels essentially different from its alternative it is hardly surprising that a self aware being would consider itself ‘special’ and unique, maybe even blessed or chosen. But with this gift comes fear. Fear of the end of consciousness, the end of self-awareness - death in other words.

Up until comparatively recently humans had an intimate knowledge of death and reasonably considered it a central mystery in their lives and I think that this is the crux of the matter. We have a feeling that we are special because of our apparent uniqueness in the animal world. At the same time we live in a world where death is the great leveller and I’m guessing that it wasn’t long before the early philosophers decided that death cannot be the end of things because we are so special. There must be, they had to decide, an existence after death. After all, how can something so special as the only self-aware being on the planet simply cease to be after a few short years as if it had never existed? It just doesn’t make any sense. At that moment religion was born. We are self-aware which makes us special. So special that death cannot be the end of things. The detailed mechanisms would have come later; the idea of the soul (after all bodies decay), the idea of a separate realm that the departed enter (later elaborated to a bad place and a good place with a judge who decides) – and so on. But the nub, the crux, the seed of it all was fear. Fear of death, the death of consciousness.

It follows that non self-aware creatures shouldn’t have religions and this certainly seems to be true (or at least as far as we can tell). Does it also follow that a self-aware creature who was completely unafraid of death would also be without religion? It’s certainly an interesting question.

12 comments:

greatwhitebear said...

Religion serves two purposes. It is an attempt to explain the myseries of life surrounding us. More importantly, religion serves as means societal control.

95% of what goes on in any religious instiution is about power. Who has it, who wants it. Religion is, more than anything else, a means of keeping the masses in line with society's social mores.

CyberKitten said...

Indeed it does GWB. I've read several good pieces of analysis both from a Functional and a Marxist perspective that make a lot of sense.

However, I'm really more interested in the 'why' of religion rather than the 'how' of it. Humans will use just about any institution as a means to gain and hold power and as a means of societal control. I don't think that religion is very special in that sense.

Laura said...

This is why I separate Religion with Spirituality. Religion is an institution, often with social and political motives, as GWB said. Spirituality is an individual's search for something beyond themselves.

As to why humans are so fixated on finding something beyond themselves is because being self aware also creates a vain sense of self importance. We need to know why we're here. It can't just be random, we're too special. Political and social institutions latched onto this need for explanation and exploited it.

CyberKitten said...

Laura said: As to why humans are so fixated on finding something beyond themselves is because being self aware also creates a vain sense of self importance. We need to know why we're here. It can't just be random, we're too special.

Exactly. That's where the feeling of 'there MUST be something else' comes from... and what a shock to the system it would be if there WAS nothing else... and we were shown that we're nothing special.

Is religion just a huge ego trip? Sounds like it doesn't it...?

Sadie Lou said...

This is why I separate Religion with Spirituality. Religion is an institution, often with social and political motives, as GWB said. Spirituality is an individual's search for something beyond themselves.

My thoughts exactly. While Jesus told us to gather together as believers and Paul warns us not to forsake the fellowship--religion is a man-made organization to which is seriously flawed more times than not.

Foilwoman said...

Cyberkitten: Could you drop me an email at Foilwoman at gmail dot com? I would like to ask you a question or two that I don't want to tie up blog space doing. Thanks.

Doctor Marco said...

I dont think there is ego in the origin of religion. I think it is lack of knowlegde, coupled with lack of an abstract process of thought.

Juggling Mother said...

I'm not sure it's an ego trip, so much as a ned to find order within chaos: We needed to have a reason for what we couldn't understand or change - death, disease, social inequality etc.

As has been discussed before, we have an inate sense of justice/fairness & life is patently unfair! Religion was "invented" to explain why, and to offer the promise that individuals did have some control over their afterlife, if not their life - it's the one thing that all religions ancient & modern have in common.

Foilwoman said...

Unfortunately, the need for religion (explanation/justification of bad things happening, telling ourselves our lives have meaning) actually seems to (at least at times) hinder logical thought processes. Rational thought is such an important part of human progress and development, and often religious faith/belief seems directly opposed to the end results of logical thoughts. I think before scientific progress reached its current level (or that of a century before) religion was less problematic for the intellectually rigorous.

CyberKitten said...

foilwoman said: I think before scientific progress reached its current level (or that of a century before) religion was less problematic for the intellectually rigorous.

The history of the conflict between science & religion or between faith and reason is certainly an interesting one. For a while there was a sort of armistace as science and technology struggled to explain God's creation... Then inconvenient facts started to accumulate which basically blew away many of the long held and cherished beliefs of the Church.

There are a variety of responses to the advancement of scientific knowledge.

Scientific knowledge has replaced an earlier flawed knowledge of the universe - called religion.

As science advances religion retreats (God of the Gaps) until it finally vanishes.

A rejection of science in favour of a faith based understanding of the universe.

A balancing act where some science is accepted but science that 'goes too far' is rejected.

Some people fit into one camp, some into another whilst others move between camps. As usual the two extremes are easier to maintain.

Juggling Mother said...

Ok, OK, I gave my opinion of the explanation as to why it was invented.

Now it exisits for the same reason to the uneducated, and because of tradition and/or power for the educated. And from our natural resistance to upset the order of things.

One day it will be history, but we are a long long way away from one day.

Unknown said...

I've thought about this quite a bit, too.
Some tenuous conclusions are:
That when humankind became aware of process (became conscious) that the awareness of birth and death lead to a need to continue. Death had to have been "scary," -- and what happened to the personality that had inhabited a body? Later the need to have cohesive groups that cooperated may have lead to the idea of "earning" the type of afterlife a given personality would achieve.
Secondly, it has occurred to me that the exodus from the "Garden of Eden" may also be a result of consciousness. Living in the Nile delta provided needed sustenance -- on a moment to moment, minute to minute basis. In the absence of consciousness, all living beings live in the "now." Reality of life was meeting the needs of the body as those needs could be met. Hunger -- hunt -- eat -- or, sometimes, fight or flee, get caught, be eaten. But, possibly, no additional considerations were attached to these activities. Once we became conscious the "Garden" became a much more complex place -- and that complexity has become more sophisticated as the centuries have passed. Hunt - eat or be eaten. Hunt - cook -- eat. Someone else hunts --barter - cook -- eat. Now we purchase food, cook it, eat it. OR someone else purchases it, cooks it, and we purchase their services. And now the type and taste of the food matters. Consciousness has become very complex.

The complexity and sophistication of our activities seems to be common to most of our endeavors over time. We still kill -- we stoned, hung, electrocuted, injected, -- and on and on and on. We now have sophisticated organizations and machines for the purpose.

Religions are also politically helpful. Do "good" people revolt -- or remind themselves that their goodness will gain them a desired afterlife while that x@#%+ will not. Vengence is mine, but "(s)he will eventually pay for wrongs. This is much less expensive for governments than putting down revolts.
We also like to have a sense that we can control the effects of outside forces that impact our lives. Sometime we have absolutely no way to do that, but certainly do want someone or something that can deplete pain and enhance pleasure. That being, to religious people, is a creator that is aware of everyone and everything -- omnificent.

There is an alternative: take it to the next level. Instead of moral judgment (based on a given group's beliefs), we could use ethical conduct based on respect for individual differences that do not threaten social progress.

We can begin by educating individuals, creating logical, organized minds that recognize the efforts of those who wish to confuse with circular logic.