About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Sunday, July 29, 2007

An Inconvenient Truth: Beware the Politician in Fleece Clothing

by John Lang for the Baltimore Sun (Maryland)

September 13, 2006

Dear Mr. President,

It's too bad The Art of War wasn't on your summer reading list. If you'd read it, maybe we wouldn't be mired in Iraq. According to the author, Sun Tzu, esteemed for thousands of years as the Sage of Warfare, you're doing it all wrong. Exactly what military principles you've broken - and how many - I learned by chance. On the first day of classes at Washington College, the title on a shelf of paperbacks caught my eye. I opened at random and found this on Page 10: "In war, better take a state intact than destroy it."

Then came a critique of your plan to recall reservists for more tours: "The skillful warrior never conscripts troops a second time." And, "Supplying an army at a distance drains the public coffers. ... Six-tenths are spent on broken chariots, worn-out horses." That last is archaically put, but don't we have thousands of war-wrecked Humvees and tanks now - while short of funds to fix them? On Page 13, I found: "Treat prisoners of war kindly, and care for them." How does that square with Guantanamo? Page after page, Sun Tzu has something to say to you, even though the principles were stated something like 2,500 years ago. But your reading list this summer, so the White House said, included a three-volume history of the Louisiana Purchase. In a summer past, as casualties mounted, we were told you read a comprehensive history of salt. That's hardly as germane as The Art of War, which states, "No nation has ever benefited from a protracted war."

Of course, reading lists of politicians are always suspect. You feed doubts when you tell us that this summer you also read "three Shakespeares." Your aides have said you don't read their briefing papers but direct them to read them to you. Then why not get those neocons who advised you into this war to give Master Sun a glance? Vice President Dick Cheney owns the book; according to news reports, Chinese officials gave Mr. Cheney an out-of-print copy valued at $3,600, though it's not clear whether he's read it.

Perhaps your advisers can slip Sun Tzu's maxims into the daily digest. After, say, the latest blurb on slaughter between Sunni and Shiite factions, an aide could read: "Without knowing the plans of the feudal lords, you cannot form alliances." Or, before another retired general or formerly supportive Republican congressman goes looking for Iraq's back door, your reader can find: "When an army is confused and perplexed, the feudal princes will cause trouble. This creates chaos in the ranks and gives away victory." Sir, you can be certain, if you don't know Sun Tzu, your enemies do. It's the revolutionary's primer. Mao Tse-tung carried a copy on his Long March. It was Fidel Castro's campfire reading when he was hiding out in the Sierra Maestre.

Can the teachings have escaped the notice of Osama bin Laden? Not likely. Consider The Art of War on evasion: "He changes his ways and alters his plans to keep the enemy in ignorance." Also, "The highest skill in forming dispositions is to be without form; formlessness is proof against the prying of the subtlest spy and the machinations of the wisest brain." Concluding, "The place I intend to attack must not be known; if it is unknown, the enemy will have to reinforce many places ... but I shall attack few." And, "Throw your men where there is no escape, and they will die rather than flee."

Sounds exactly like al-Qaida. What would it hurt to read the guerrillas' guidebook? Don't you owe it to us, and yourself? After all, as you've said to us, "I am a wartime president." And the Master says, "He who knows self, but not the enemy, will suffer one defeat for every victory."

[I guess that Bush was elected ‘to lead rather than to read’……. You would think though that even after he famously said that he doesn’t read newspapers that the ‘Leader of the Free World’ would tailor his reading habits to the difficult foreign policy decisions he needs to be making these days. Instead of reading a 3 volume tome on Louisiana maybe he would have been better served by reading some Middle Eastern history? It’s just a thought…..]

5 comments:

OldLady Of The Hills said...

It all just couldn't be more depressing, could it? And frankly, I am very frightened for our country's health right now...Bush, signing into "law" whatever HE wants....Help Us And Save Us from this Dictator Mentality...What happened to our Democracy?

About that picture on your desk....LOL! What was the purpose of that? If you are sitting at your desk...Why would one need a picture on the desk, as well....LOL!
So happy it all went the way of so many stupid ideas!

Laughing Boy said...

Not that I'm any fan of Mr. Bush, but is it really necessary that he sit down with a book about the Middle East to get any information? For you and me and John Lang, it probably is. But then again we don't have tens of thousands of 'underlings' who have already read, and in some cases written, those books, and have decades of first-hand experience to boot.

It doesn't seem like Bush has made use of those resources, either, but if he was heading off to Crawford with a relevant book under his arm, even Sun Tzu, I would not be any more confident.

CyberKitten said...

Laughing boy said: Not that I'm any fan of Mr. Bush, but is it really necessary that he sit down with a book about the Middle East to get any information?

Oh, I don't think that reading a few (even well chosen) books would help GWB very much. I just thought that his (apparent) reading habits could more closely knit with situations he is likely to be called on to deal with. Personally when I could across a problem my first impulse is to find a good source of information on the subject - in my case a book as I can't really call on the testimony of experts themselves IRL.

I think it's a truism that a well read and well educated leader of state (or any leader actually) is a better option than the opposite. At least I would expect so...!

Oh, and welcome back!

Laughing Boy said...

I just thought that his (apparent) reading habits could more closely knit with situations he is likely to be called on to deal with.

I agree. Perhaps he should put down the book on salt and pick up one on sand. Baby steps.

Commented in your Chain of Evidence post. Naturalism post still a work in progress.

Oh, and welcome back!

Thanks. I needed a break. This stuff can take over your life if you're not careful.

CyberKitten said...

laughing boy said: Commented in your Chain of Evidence post.

Saw it thanks. I'll reply in a separate post.... actually *several* posts.... [grin].

laughing boy said: This stuff can take over your life if you're not careful.

True. Fortunately I have other hobbies and interests with the power to drag me away from the Blogoverse.