About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Saturday, June 28, 2008

HUBBLE finds Extrasolar planets far across Galaxy

From NASA

Oct. 4, 2006

NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has discovered 16 extrasolar planet candidates orbiting a variety of distant stars in the central region of our Milky Way galaxy. The planet bonanza was uncovered during a Hubble survey called the Sagittarius Window Eclipsing Extrasolar Planet Search (SWEEPS). Hubble looked farther than has ever successfully been searched before for extrasolar planets. Hubble peered at 180,000 stars in the crowded central bulge of our galaxy 26,000 light-years away. That is one-quarter the diameter of the Milky Way's spiral disk.

This tally is consistent with the number of planets expected to be uncovered from such a distant survey, based on previous exoplanet detections made in our local solar neighborhood. Hubble's narrow view covered a swath of sky no bigger in angular size than two percent the area of the full moon. When extrapolated to the entire galaxy, Hubble's data provides strong evidence for the existence of approximately six billion Jupiter-sized planets in the Milky Way.

Five of the newly discovered planets represent a new extreme type of planet not found in any nearby searches. Dubbed Ultra-Short-Period Planets (USPPs), these worlds whirl around their stars in less than one Earth day. "Discovering the very short-period planets was a big surprise," said team leader Kailash Sahu of the Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore. "Our discovery also gives very strong evidence that planets are as abundant in other parts of the galaxy as they are in our solar neighborhood."

Hubble could not directly view the 16 newly found planet candidates. Astronomers used Hubble's Advanced Camera for Surveys to search for planets by measuring the slight dimming of a star due to the passage of a planet in front of it, an event called a transit. The planet would have to be about the size of Jupiter to block enough starlight, about one to 10 percent, to be measurable by Hubble.

The planets are called candidates, because astronomers could only obtain follow-up mass measurements for two of them due to the distance and faintness of these systems. Following an exhaustive analysis, the team ruled out alternative explanations such as a grazing transit by a stellar companion that could mimic the predicted signature of a true planet. The finding could more than double the number of planets spied with the transit technique to date. There is a tendency for the planet candidates to revolve around stars more abundant in elements heavier than hydrogen and helium, such as carbon. This supports theories that stars rich in heavy elements have the necessary ingredients to form planets.

The planet candidate with the shortest orbital period, named SWEEPS-10, swings around its star in 10 hours. Located only 740,000 miles from its star, the planet is among the hottest ever detected. It has an estimated temperature of approximately 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit. "This star-hugging planet must be at least 1.6 times the mass of Jupiter, otherwise the star's gravitational muscle would pull it apart," said SWEEPS team member Mario Livio. "The star's low temperature allows the planet to survive so near to the star."

"Ultra-Short-Period Planets seem to occur preferentially around normal red dwarf stars that are smaller and cooler than our sun," Sahu explained. "The apparent absence of USPPs around sun-like stars in our local neighborhood indicates that they might have evaporated away when they migrated too close to a hotter star."

There is an alternative reason why Jupiter-like planets around cooler stars may migrate in closer to the star than such planets around hotter stars. The circumstellar disk of gas and dust out of which they formed extends in closer to a cooler star. Since the discovery of the first "hot Jupiter" around another star in 1995, astronomers have realized this unusual type of massive planet must have spiraled in close to its parent star from a more distant location where it must have formed. The inner edge of a circumstellar disk halts the migration.

Planetary transits occur only when the planet's orbit is viewed nearly edge-on. However, only about 10 percent of hot Jupiters have edge-on orbits that allow the planet to be observed transiting a star. To be successful, transit surveys must view a large number of stars at once. The SWEEPS transit survey covered a rich field of stars in the Sagittarius Window. The term "window" implies a clear view into the galactic center, but much of the galactic plane is obscured by dust. Hubble monitored 180,000 stars for periodic, brief dimming in a star's brightness. The star field was observed over a continuous seven-day period Feb. 23-29, 2004.

To ensure the dimming was caused by an object orbiting a star, the team used Hubble to detect from two to 15 consecutive transits for each of the 16 planet candidates. Two stars in the field are bright enough that the SWEEPS team could make an independent confirmation of a planet's presence by spectroscopically measuring a slight wobble in the star's motion due to the gravitational pull of an unseen companion. They used the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope, located on Mount Paranal in Chile, to measure a slight wobble in the star.

One of the planetary candidates has a mass below the detection limit of 3.8 Jupiter masses. The other candidate is 9.7 Jupiter masses, which is below the minimum mass of 13 Jupiter masses for a brown dwarf. A brown dwarf is an object that forms like a star but does not have enough mass to shine by nuclear fusion. Since the stars are so faint and the field of view is so densely packed with stars, measuring the slight wobble in the star's motion using spectroscopy to confirm most of the planet candidates is not feasible. Future telescopes such as NASA's James Webb Space Telescope will provide the needed sensitivity to confirm most of the planet candidates.

The Hubble SWEEPS program is an important proof-of-concept for NASA's future Kepler Mission, scheduled for launch in 2008. The Kepler observatory will continuously monitor a region of the Milky Way galaxy to detect transiting planets around mostly distant stars. Kepler will be sensitive enough to detect possibly hundreds of Earth-size planet candidates in or near the habitable zone, the distance from a star where liquid water could feasibly exist on a planet's surface.

[So, there could be six billion Jupiter sized planets in this Galaxy alone. That's a lot of planets. It's probable that systems with Jupiter sized planets have smaller Earth sized planets too - some of which will reside in the habitable zone where liquid water exists. That could mean millions of life bearing planets - in this Galaxy alone. I thin k that the odds for life elsewhere just went up - don't you?]

8 comments:

Laura said...

That's just crazytalk right there! ;)

Statistically speaking, the probability that there's life elsewhere have always been higher than the probability that we're somehow alone and special. But people see what they want. Especially those who never paid attention in science class...

Juggling Mother said...

ahh, but what is the probability of that life existing at the same time as us, given the billions of years available and the miniscule amount of time we've been around in any form.

Never mind the probablility that they are humanoid and quite enjoy probing American rednecks...

CyberKitten said...

laura said: Statistically speaking, the probability that there's life elsewhere have always been higher than the probability that we're somehow alone and special.

Definitely. The numbers concerned are just too big.

laura said: But people see what they want. Especially those who never paid attention in science class...

True. You may have seen 'arguments' posted here that seem to be saying that we *are* unique (and created by God) so - seemingly - must be alone in the Universe. That seems to me (and others who have commented here) to be absurd.

JM said: but what is the probability of that life existing at the same time as us, given the billions of years available and the miniscule amount of time we've been around in any form.

Oh, I think that the odds of bumping into an alien civilisation are much lower than finding life. But life has been around on Earth for about 4 Billion years. Given that and the fact that the Universe is about 15 Billion years old I think that life should still be present on other worlds if we get to them in the next thousand years or the next 100 thousand years. What stage any civilisation will be at - that's pretty much anyone's guess!

JM said: Never mind the probablility that they are humanoid and quite enjoy probing American rednecks...

Oh, I think that probability of rednecks being probed is very low.... [laughs]

Unknown said...

This news dates back from 2006. Scores of additional exoplanets have been discovered since. The tally is 303 so far and dozens await confirmation. Instruments are more and more precise and ESA's HARPS has uncovered 45 just in the last month. It is now exponential and thousands of planets will be uncovered in the coming years. There is not one logical reason why there shouldn't be viable planets among the billion of them out there. Extra-terrestrial life will be evidenced before the end of the century, and I bet it will be even before that.

CyberKitten said...

sacred c said: This news dates back from 2006.

Indeed it does. I'm working through my NASA e-mail backlog...

sacred c said: Instruments are more and more precise and ESA's HARPS has uncovered 45 just in the last month.

Excellent news.

sacred c said: There is not one logical reason why there shouldn't be viable planets among the billion of them out there.

Totally agree.

sacred c said: Extra-terrestrial life will be evidenced before the end of the century, and I bet it will be even before that.

Oh, I do hope so. It'd be great if they could positively find something before I kick off.

Welcome BTW. Thanks for your input.

wstachour said...

I remember reading an exposé about astronomical numbers for a lay person like myself, where even the faintest (say, a one-in-a-billion chance) of a star having planets translates into billions of planets from which to choose.

This article makes a concrete stab at what was theoretical before. The odds are surely in favor of there being many other earth-like worlds.

Unknown said...

The Drake equation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drake_equation brings light to the debate.
It is now estimated, thanks to Hubble telescope observations, that there are around 125 billion galaxies in the observable universe, hosting altogether 70 sextillion (7×1022) stars. Currently, it is considered half of stars host planets, an average of 2, on the increase because instruments discover more smaller ones as they become more precise.
Given the mind-blowing numbers of planets out there, the sheer probability that life appeared on just one is zilch. Life is swarming across the universe and we'll hold the evidence very soon.

Thomas Fummo said...

I unfortunately will not be able to add such verbose contributions to the discussion.
All I cans ay is 'awesomesauce', 'yayness' and other such idiot manifestations of my happiness.

:-p
yay aliens.
"Oh god, I hope they bring back Elvis!"
-crazy woman from Indipendence day