My Favourite Movies: Black Hawk Down
This is a little more up to date than my last fave but still
old enough to have some perspective on it. Along with my love of Westerns I’m a
big fan of decent thoughtful War Stories. War can, despite all the questionable
aspects surrounding it, bring out the best (though more often the worst) in
people. BHD – based on the excellent account of the battle by Mark Bowden – is
an example of what happens when young men, who are singularly unprepared for
what happened to them, are put through the meat grinder. Inevitably the movie
is a very much cut-down version of real events. Several actual people are often
moulded into a single actor and incidents are told in the wrong order, enhanced
for dramatic effect or missed out all together. It often needs to be remembered
that we are watching a Hollywood movie here
and not a documentary about contemporary events. What we see on the screen is,
first and foremost, for our entertainment. All war movies come in for
criticism. No matter how realistic they try to be they can never truly show
both the horror and the banality of war. No matter the sentiment they will,
inevitably it seems, be accused of either glorifying conflict, promoting
imperialism (either political or cultural) or of being – as this movie was –
racist. Sometimes it would seem you just can’t win.
But I guess Ridley Scott and Jerry Bruckheimer (yes, him
again) must have been doing something right as this film won a pair of Oscars for
Best Film Editing and Best Sound (now I can see why the DVD just said “Winner
of 2 Oscars”) though it was at least nominated for Best Cinematography and Best
Director. But what about the actual story? It takes place in Somalia in 1993
where a crushing civil war is tearing the country apart. The US decides
(along with the UN) that enough is enough and sends in Delta Force and The
Rangers to sort things out. The mission featured in the movie – and in far more
detail in the book – is an attempt to capture senior members of the controlling
militia. To that end helicopter forces drop in and start doing just that – but
as everyone knows, no plan survives contact with the enemy. When a Black Hawk
helicopter is shot down everything changes and the snatch becomes a rescue in
hostile territory against incredible odds – with limited food, water and
ammunition. Told that they would be away from their base for no more than a few
hours many of the young soldiers didn’t take much of anything with them. Now
trapped and running out of just about everything needed to survive they need to
rely on each other to get through the night.
There are many outstanding performances in this film and
I’ll highlight just a few. Josh Hartnett plays Sgt Eversmann who’s just been
given his first command. Dedicated to keeping his men alive he finds the
realities of combat almost too much to bear. Tom Sizemore played I think my
favourite character Danny McKnight who walked across ever battlefield as if he
was walking across a quiet beach or going for a stroll in his hometown. He seemed
completely impervious to gunfire even when one bullet clipped his neck. Then
there was Eric Banner as Hoot, a laconic member of Delta force who tries to
teach Eversmann that no matter how hard he tries he can’t control events once
the shooting starts.
4 comments:
"All war movies come in for criticism. No matter how realistic they try to be they can never truly show both the horror and the banality of war. No matter the sentiment they will, inevitably it seems, be accused of either glorifying conflict, promoting imperialism (either political or cultural) or of being – as this movie was – racist. " - CK, I would cite Terence Malick's 'The Thin Red Line' as one of the few war movies that avoids those inevitabilities. It also includes battle scenes that are engaging without being glorifying. It's a beautiful piece of work, if you haven't seen it.
As for BHD, I haven't seen it since it first came out, though I did enjoy it immensely at the time.
I haven't seen this, but your review makes me think I should.
I confess to still having a bad taste in my mouth concerning contemporary military matters, as military service in this country feels like it was co-opted by Fox News for highly odious political purposes. I am thus skeptical of the verity of any news we get on military matters and of most of the purposes we are putting our military to. When everything gets thumbs-up from Republicans here I tend to have a visceral and very negative reaction.
This is a good film. I'm with Wunelle in that I have a general tendency to be skeptical of war movies and especially those that the Right has a positive view of. But Ridley Scott has earned some leeway with me with his many great movies that he has made.
It's a very visceral movie and I don't feel that it glorifies war or minimizes the bad things we do in war.
AM said: It's a beautiful piece of work, if you haven't seen it.
I haven't seen the whole movie but on your recommendation I'll look out for it.
wunelle said: I am thus skeptical of the verity of any news we get on military matters and of most of the purposes we are putting our military to.
I'm getting rather sick of all the pro-military news and other programs over here too. I find it all rather disturbing..... I can recommend the book 'Black Hawk Down' to you. I think it pretty much tells it as it is.
dbackdad said: But Ridley Scott has earned some leeway with me with his many great movies that he has made.
Ridley Scott always gets my positive interest. He's made a number of very good movies.
Post a Comment