Just Finished Reading :
The Shockwave Rider by John Brunner
21st Century America - a hugely competitive,
technologically obsessed nation. The price for a constantly accelerating pace
of change is a severe and growing social disconnect, a feeling that everything
is beyond control, it is a society living with Future Shock. In a effort to
keep their countries competitive edge, the US government institute a series of
institutions designed to create the managers and leaders of the future who can
see patterns where others see chaos and who can successfully act on information
others are barely aware of. Teenage misfit Nickie Haflinger is one such person,
or at least potentially one, when he is inducted into the elite Tarnover Academy . It’s not long before he realises
though that not all is as advertised. As he continues to out-think his supposed
tutors he discovers the real purpose behind the government programmes – control
and manipulation of the entire population for the benefit of the few chosen
leaders. Escaping back into society Nickie becomes a chameleon, blending into
multiple personalities always two steps ahead of his pursuers. Until that is he
discovers another version of himself and a strange town called Precipice where
he decides to change everything.
This is, in many ways, a rather odd SF Classic. Despite
being based in the early to mid 21st century it is clearly a product
of its time. First published in 1975 it predates the computer age and therefore
fails to predict most of the day-to-day ‘miracles’ we take for granted. Yet at
the same time the author manages to predict some of the more commonplace
headlines of today that would surely have astounded anyone picked up from that
time and plonked down in front of a widescreen TV anywhere in the ‘developed’ world.
The book had an almost quaint nostalgic feel to it but at the same time
highlighted just how much the world has changed in the last 35 odd years when
compared with the ‘future’ envisioned between its pages. It was almost at times
like watching several versions of a movie superimposed over to top of each
other – a sort of landscape with things how they where, things how they are and
things how it was imagined they would be all mixed in together. This book is, I
think, above all else a very political book. It is a work deeply critical of
modern technological society and what it does to the people – who are
essentially still the same apes that trooped across the African Savannah millennia
ago – forced to cope with change upon change without any opportunity to
influence or effect what is being asked of them. Holding this book up to the 21st
century as is – rather than the one imagined – shows how much has changed
technologically and yet how little has changed in human nature. The majority of
people do seem to be able to cope with the pace of change experienced today
(which is honestly far higher than that portrayed in this book – rather
unsurprisingly) but how long this human adaptability can continue to absorb the
continual shocks is anyone’s guess.
2 comments:
Interesting. Your description of the main character reminded me a bit of Ender's Game.
It's been awhile since I've read any older or "classic" sci-fi. I wonder if I would have a similar reaction as you. It seems that in the last 5 years, all of the sci-fi I've read has been among contemporary authors (Bear, Banks, Stephenson, Gibson, etc.) I wonder how it would be for me to re-read some of the sci-fi of my youth (Heinlein, Herbert, Clarke, Niven).
dbackdad said: Your description of the main character reminded me a bit of Ender's Game.
I can see what you mean there. Ender was also a youth, used by the system, who turns his talents on the people who tried to manipulate him.
dbackdad said: It's been awhile since I've read any older or "classic" sci-fi. I wonder if I would have a similar reaction as you.
Most of my classic SF reading took place in my teens and early 20's for which I am very grateful. I read a *lot* of very good books back then which have served me as a great foundation for what came later.
dbackdad said: It seems that in the last 5 years, all of the sci-fi I've read has been among contemporary authors.
Ditto. The vast majority of my reading in all genres comes from the last 20 years. I'm very conscious of the fact that books like this - written a mere 37 years ago - are unusual in that regard. One of my upcoming challenges is to read 10 consecutive books published before I was born! That'll hopefully break the mold a bit!
Post a Comment