Just Finished Reading :
A Brief History of The Celts by Peter Berresford Ellis
It was clearly the intention of the author to rehabilitate
the image of the Celt away from that of the violence drunk warrior people who
sacked Rome
more than once and made a major contributor to the downfall of that
civilisation offering nothing in its place. Such an image has remained in place
because of the views (largely) of the very Romans they helped to destroy.
Julius Caesar himself, in his classic and oft quoted Conquest of Gaul, puts
them firmly in their place as stereotypical barbarians good for little else but
slaughter on the battlefield.
But, as this book clearly points out time and again there
was far more to the Celts than their warrior persona. But first Ellis put to
bed the sometimes argued idea that the Celts themselves did not exist and where
in fact yet another Victorian invention. With both documentary and
archaeological evidence Ellis nails this erroneous idea as yet another attempt
to redefine history contrary to literally mounds of evidence. After outlining
their political and social structure – equally as complex as the societies
around them – Ellis delves deeply into their religious Elite, the Druids who
were at the time universally admired by all who interacted with them with the
notable exception of Rome
who went to great lengths to destroy them as a force in the Celtic world. This
fact alone shows how important they were.
There is no getting around that the Celts were a warrior
people – though such was hardly unusual at the time. Indeed the Celts proved to
be one of the Roman Empires deadliest opponents who were responsible for
numerous defeats of Roman ambitions throughout the European continent. Without
their influence it is arguable that some of what we regard as Roman weapons and
tactics may never have been applied to such good effect against Rome ’s enemies. In the
centuries of bruising conflict between the two sides Rome learnt a great deal from its many
defeats and set-backs.
One of the things that shocked Romans when they came into
regular contact with Celtic society was their women. Roman observers were
scandalised by the fact that women often decided who their lovers and husbands
would be and could divorce them if they proved to be inadequate. Such a thing –
along with owning property, inheriting land as well as leading warriors into
battle – was practically unheard of in the Ancient world. One thing that really
struck me was a Celtic law that allowed a woman to take any action against her
adulterous husband for 48 hours after learning of his adultery: - It being
considered that she would be far too angry and emotional to be held accountable
for her actions. Such a law did not, however, apply to men who were considered
to be rational enough to be in control of what they did and therefore to be
held accountable for their actions!
No comments:
Post a Comment