Feathers fly in first bird debate
From The BBC
27 July 2011
For 150 years, a species called Archaeopteryx has been
regarded as the first true bird, representing a major evolutionary step away
from dinosaurs. But the new fossil suggests this creature was just another
feathery dinosaur and not the significant link that palaeontologists had
believed. The discovery of Xiaotingia, as it is known, is reported in Nature
magazine. The authors of the report argue that three other species named in the
past decade might now be serious contenders for the title of "the oldest
bird". Archaeopteryx has a hallowed place in science, long hailed as not
just the first bird but as one of the clearest examples of evolution in
action. Archaeopteryx is one of the most famous fossils ever unearthed. Discovered
in Bavaria in 1861 just two years after the
publication of Darwin 's
Origin of Species, the fossil seemed to blend attributes of both reptiles and
birds and was quickly accepted as the "original bird". But in recent years, doubts have arisen as older fossils
with similar bird-like features such as feathers and wishbones and three
fingered hands were discovered.
Now, renowned Chinese palaeontologist Professor Xu Xing
believes his new discovery has finally knocked Archaeopteryx off its perch. His
team has detailed the discovery of a similar species, Xiaotingia, which dates
back 155 million years to the Jurassic Period. By carefully analysing and
comparing the bony bumps and grooves of this new chicken-sized fossil, Prof Xu
now believe that both Archaeopteryx and Xiaotingia are in fact feathery
dinosaurs and not birds at all. "There are many, many features that
suggest that Xiaotingia and Archaeopteryx are a type of dinosaur called
Deinonychosaurs rather than birds. For example, both have a large hole in front
of the eye; this big hole is only seen in these species and is not present in
any other birds.
Several species discovered in the past decade could now
become contenders for the title of most basal fossil bird. Epidexipteryx - a
very small feathered dinosaur discovered in China and first reported in 2008.
It had four long tail feathers but there is little evidence that it could fly. Jeholornis
- this creature lived 120 million years ago in the Cretaceous. It was a relatively
large bird, about the size of a turkey. First discovered in China , and
reported in 2002. Sapeornis - lived 110 to 120 million years ago. Another small
primitive bird about 33 centimetres in length. It was discovered in China
and was first reported in 2002.
"Archaeopteryx and Xiaotingia are very, very similar to
other Deinonychosaurs in having a quite interesting feature - the whole group
is categorised by a highly specialised second pedo-digit which is highly
extensible, and both Archaeopteryx and Xiaotingia show initial development of
this feature." The origins of the new fossil are a little murky having
originally been purchased from a dealer. Prof Xu first saw the specimen at the Shandong Tianyu Museum .
He knew right away it was special "When I visited the museum which houses
more than 1,000 feathery dinosaur skeletons, I saw this specimen and
immediately recognised that it was something new, very interesting; but I did
not expect it would have such a big impact on the origin of birds." Other
scientists agree that the discovery could fundamentally change our understanding of birds. Prof Lawrence Witmer from Ohio University
has written a commentary on the finding. "Since Archaeopteryx was
found 150 years ago, it has been the most primitive bird and consequently every
theory about the beginnings of birds - how they evolved flight, what their diet
was like - were viewed through the lens of Archaeopteryx. So, if we don't view
birds through this we might have a different set of hypotheses."
There is a great deal of confusion in the field says Prof
Witmer as scientists try to understand where dinosaurs end and where birds
begin. "It's kind of a nightmare for those of us trying to understand it.
When we go back into the late Jurassic, 150-160 million years ago, all the
primitive members of these different species are all very similar. So, on the
one hand, it's really frustrating trying to tease apart the threads of this
evolutionary knot, but it's really a very exciting thing to be working on and
taking apart this evolutionary origin." Such are the similarities between
these transition species of reptiles and birds that other scientists believe
that the new finding certainly will not mean the end of the argument. Prof Mike
Benton from the University of Bristol, UK, agrees that the new fossil is about
the closest relative to Archaeopteryx that has yet been found. But he argues
that it is far from certain that the new finding dethrones its claim to be the
first bird. "Professor Xu and his colleagues show that the evolutionary
pattern varies according to their different analyses. Some show Archaeopteryx
as the basal bird; others show it hopped sideways into the Deinonychosaurs. New
fossils like Xiaotingia can make it harder to be 100% sure of the exact pattern
of relationships." According to Prof Witmer, little is certain in trying
to determine the earliest bird and new findings can rapidly change
perspectives. "The reality is, that next fossil find could kick
Archaeopteryx right back into birds. That's the thing that's really exciting
about all of this."
[Birds, it seems, are on the cutting edge of evolutionary
studies these days. With all of the new fossils coming out of China and South America
recently a lot of the gaps are being filled in and our understanding is growing
year on year. Exciting indeed!]
No comments:
Post a Comment