I don’t often post rants on this Blog because it’s not that
kind of place. There are already quite enough websites out there that fill the
Internet with ranting on every conceivable topic. This Blog is, I hope, a haven
from such places where people can, if they wish, discuss interesting ideas or
just stop by for a few minutes to pick up something amusing or occasionally
cute. But not today…..
I read the story of the latest killings at Newtown's Sandy Hook
Elementary School which a feeling of here-we-go-again no doubt felt across the
world. Yet again we see images of frightened crying children being led out of a
school by heavily armed police officers who are themselves getting ready to
enter the premises to pick up the pieces of the latest school shooting. Inevitably
the arguments over why this has happened (again) are already polarised into the
two camps of ‘We must do Something about This’ on one side and the ‘Right to
Bare Arms and Freedom from Oppression’ on the other. Inevitably politicians are
saying that their thoughts and prayers are going out to all involved and that
it is a (yet another) tragedy that we need to come to terms with. One other
thing is, in my mind, also inevitable: Once the rawness of the grief has faded
and other news items push the story off the front pages of the newspapers and
the headlines of the news programmes nothing will change – NOTHING – and in 3,
4 or 6 months someone else will walk into a school and start shooting kids.
Children will die because Americans value their Constitution and their Freedom
to carry weapons more, apparently much more, than the lives of children. It’s
that simple. Compared to words on paper written hundreds of years ago, compared
to the opportunity to own something which is only designed with one function –
to enable killing from a distance – the life of a child (or in this case at
least 20 children) is irrelevant. To me, fortunately living in a different
country with an entire ocean between us, it seems incredible – actually
unthinkable – that people living in such a country could accept such a
situation. It seems to me that the regular (I was going to say occasional but
we’re way beyond that now) mass shootings have become part of the background
like the local or national weather reports, like storms or hurricanes and that
US citizens see it as just another risk to deal with – getting soaked or
flooded out during a storm, having a child gunned down in your local school.
It’s just another type of random death. Heads are shaken and tears fall after
every incident but what can we do about it everyone seems to say. It’s as if
the nation has already decided that there is nothing that can be done. So much
so that they don’t even debate the point any more. Child mass murder has now,
seemingly, become part of the equation of ‘acceptable losses’, as a payment
that is reluctantly offered up to enable Americans to be ‘Free’. I think that
the only word that describes such a culture is INSANE. Many other countries
live without mass gun ownership. Other countries seem to cope with widespread
ownership of guns – Canada
springs to mind – without the regular killing of its more innocent population.
It is, as the irrationally powerful gun lobby says, more than about simple
access to guns, but having access to such weapons certainly helps to make these
horrors a far too regular occurrence. The only way to reduce such incidents to
a truly acceptable level – zero – is to reduce the number of guns to an
acceptable level – zero. Of course this will never happen. So the killings will
continue, the tears will continue and the justifications will continue. Get
used to it if you can.
7 comments:
I've kept a low internet profile the last day or so because of the kind of activity I'm seeing -- on the *day* the massacre happened, before the blood had even been wiped from the floor of the school, there were creatures on facebook yelling about the sanctity of gun rights and how gun-free zones were a counterproductive idea.
It's so sickening I can't even get angry.
As bizarre as you think it is from afar, it is just as bizarre for rational people over here.
I'm sick of hearing that this is about "freedom". It is not. People who scream about the right to bear arms are painfully silent on the other freedoms. Most notably, conservatives that say we should have more guns, not less, are the same that are saying this happened because God is not in our schools. In effect, they are elevating one right why conveniently forgetting about another.
There's one discussion I haven't heard yet. In each of these shootings, you have a person with mental health issues. We began to see a lot more peope with mental health issues getting dumped on the streets in the 1980s. Government subsidies for mental health treatment were cut drastically. At the same time insurance companies and their lobbyists became more powerful. It became more common for people not to get the mental health treatment they needed. Hospital stays were costly, so the government and insurance companies began putting time limits or dollar limits on what could be covered. A lot of these people in previous generations would have been hospitalized much longer until they could reach a maintenance level of health. Now we cut them loose before we should because there's no one to pat the bill for long term care. I used to do commitment hearings at a local hospital. The staff, who really cared, were constantly trying to find beds for patients and find ways around te time and money limitations to get people te treatment they needed.
Sorry about the typos. The iPad doesn't always catch my finger taps.
I just saw Mother Jones has an article about this.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/11/jared-loughner-mass-shootings-mental-illness
Horrible. Unimaginable. Beyond shameful. And it's the conservative vision of this country writ large. These people are insane--not just the perpetrators, who are LITERALLY insane, but those whose instinctive reaction is to protect their utterly irrational turf even as the blood flows around them. It's insane.
sc said: It's so sickening I can't even get angry.
I'm right there with you - though I am a tad angry....
dbackdad said: In effect, they are elevating one right why conveniently forgetting about another.
It does seem rather strange (OK bat-shit crazy) that the 'right' to bare arms trumps *everything* else. When exactly did that happen? Was anyone consulted? Has it ever been up for review?
v v said: In each of these shootings, you have a person with mental health issues...
Certainly as far as the media reports have stated so far the latest shooter did not have a 'history of mental illness' - whatever that means. Plus the guns used where not his but owned by his mother - so even if he had been prevented from owning guns he would still have had access to them. That's of course, the point here. It's not about mental health - although reducing the number of crazy people walking around in any community is probably a good thing - but about *availability* of firearms. It does seem somewhat off-topic as it where to seek to address things from the mental health side in a culture drowning in guns. That I think is the issue - access to guns and the willingness to use them against strangers and innocents without any regard for their lives. Where exactly did that come from? Has anyone tried to understand why this phenomena happens and why it seems to predominantly (though not exclusively I agree) happen in the USA?
wunelle said: These people are insane--not just the perpetrators, who are LITERALLY insane, but those whose instinctive reaction is to protect their utterly irrational turf even as the blood flows around them.
I do *really* struggle to understand the motivations of both the shooters and those who argue that the answer to gun violence is more guns. Because after all places with very high levels of gun ownership are widely recognized to be very safe places to bring up children - like Somalia and Afghanistan......
Post a Comment