Exoplanets near red dwarfs suggest another Earth nearer
6 February 2013
By Jason Palmer for BBC News
The nearest habitable, Earth-sized planet could be just 13
light-years away, research suggests. An analysis of small, dim "red
dwarf" stars - which make up a majority of stars in our galaxy - shows
that 6% of them host such a planet. The results will appear in Astrophysical
Journal. Study co-author David Charbonneau of Harvard University said the
findings had implications for the search for life elsewhere. "We now know
the rate of occurrence of habitable planets around the most common stars in our
galaxy," said Prof Charbonneau. "That rate implies that it will be
significantly easier to search for life beyond the solar system than we
previously thought."
The hunt for exoplanets has reached a pace that is difficult
to keep up with. The Kepler space telescope has been the source of most of the
known candidate exoplanets. It stares at a fixed patch of sky, watching a field
of more than 150,000 stars for the tiny dips in starlight that occur if an
orbiting planet passes between a star and the telescope. A catalogue run by US space agency Nasa lists
more than 800 "exoplanets", most of them spotted with this so-called
transit method. That is just the tip of the planetary iceberg, however. On the
basis of results from other methods, it has been estimated that on average,
there are 1.6 planets around every star in the night sky. But a major goal has
been finding something more like our home planet; because of the way that we
search for exoplanets, it is easier to spot the largest examples, and many in
the catalogue are far larger than the Earth. Yet, even roughly Earth-sized
planets abound - more recent research suggests that one in six stars has a
planet of about Earth's size in an orbit close to their host stars - making for
at least 17 billion in our galaxy alone. But close orbits would broadly be too
hot - the hunt seeks roughly Earth-sized planets orbiting at a sufficient
distance that water, if it is there, can exist in liquid form - and not so
distant that it freezes. This range is called the habitable zone - or
colloquially, the Goldilocks zone.
The new announcement concerns Earth-sized planets in the
habitable zones around red dwarf stars - far dimmer and smaller than our Sun.
Their low light output means that the habitable zone is far closer in. Astronomers
at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CFA) trawled through data
from Kepler, plucking out a number of red dwarf stars. Red dwarfs make up
three-quarters of the stars in our galaxy - and research has shown that older
galaxies contain even more. The team found 95 planet candidates around the dwarfs,
showing that at least 60% of them host planets smaller than Neptune. But from
the analysis, three planets of about the right temperature and roughly Earth's
size (between 90% and 170% of the Earth's radius) emerged - all between 300 and
600 light-years away. Taking into account the red dwarfs that are yet to be
detected, the analysis suggests that 6% of the stars host an Earth-like planet
in terms of size and temperature - that makes for at least 4.5 billion of them
in our galaxy. And given the proximity of many red dwarfs to the Earth, the
statistics suggest that our nearest cosy Earth-sized planet could be just 13
light-years away. "We thought we would have to search vast distances to
find an Earth-like planet. Now we realise another Earth is probably in our own
backyard, waiting to be spotted," said Courtney Dressing, lead author of
the study.
The findings hit at the heart of a question posed by the
Kepler mission's principal investigator, William Borucki, during the American
Astronomical Society meeting in January. "I think what we need to do, now
we know most stars have planets, [is find out]: do most stars have small
planets like the Earth in the habitable zone?," he told BBC News. "That's
what we'd like to know - is there likely to be life? If we find lots of those
planets, there probably is.”
[Lots of planets, lots of environments for life to emerge
and evolve, lots more chances for us not to be alone in the Galaxy/Universe. It’s
still all very circumstantial I know but even circumstantial evidence must
count for something…..]
No comments:
Post a Comment