'No signal' from targeted ET hunt
From The BBC
1 June 2012
The hunt for other intelligent civilisations has a new
technique in its arsenal, but its first use has turned up no signs of alien
broadcasts. Australian astronomers used "very long baseline interferometry"
to examine Gliese 581, a star known to host planets in its "habitable
zone". The hunt for aliens is fundamentally a vast numbers game, so the
team's result should come as no surprise. Their report, posted online, will be
published in the Astronomical Journal. In recent years, interest in such
targeted searches has begun to surge as the hunt for planets outside the Solar
System continues to find them at every turn. Astronomers currently estimate
that every star in the night sky hosts, on average, 1.6 planets - implying that
there are billions of planets out there yet to be confirmed. But a number of
stars have already been identified as playing host to rocky planets at a
distance not too hot and not too cold for liquid water - the first proxy for
amenability to life.
Gliese 581, a red dwarf star about 20 light-years away, is a
particularly interesting candidate for the Search for Extraterrestrial
Intelligence, or Seti. It has six planets, two of which are "super-Earths"
likely to be in this habitable zone. So astronomers at Curtin University's
International Centre for Radio Astronomy Research in Australia, put one of
radio astronomy's highest-resolution techniques to work, listening in to the
star system. Very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) is the process of using several
or many telescopes that are distant from one another, carefully combining their
signals to make them effectively act as one large telescope, peering intently
at a tiny portion of the sky. The team trained the Australian Long Baseline
Array onto Gliese 581 for eight hours, listening in on a range of radio
frequencies. The result was radio silence - but the team used their experience
to validate VLBI as a technique particularly suited to this kind of targeted
search. Seth Shostak, principal astronomer at the Seti Institute in the US,
said that the approach's strength lies in the fraction of the sky it examines. "It's
like they're looking at the sky through a 6-foot-long cocktail straw - a tiny
bit of the sky, so they're only sensitive to signals that are coming from right
around that star system," he told BBC News.
That is useful not only for getting a high-resolution view,
but for excluding the signals from Earthly technologies that plague Seti
efforts. "Figuring out 'is this ET or AT&T?' isn't always easy, and
VLBI gives you a good way of discriminating, because if you find something from
that tiny, tiny dot on the sky you can say that's not one of our
satellites," Dr Shostak said. He added that the team's negative result was
not disheartening, because the odds have it that the hunt for aliens, if it is
ever to find them, will require thousands or millions of observations of this
kind. "Consider the fact that you could've looked at the Earth for four billion
years with radio antennas - here was a planet that's clearly in the habitable
zone, has liquid oceans, and has an atmosphere - and yet unless you had looked
in the last 70 years and were close enough, you wouldn't have found any
intelligent life," he said. "The fact that we look at one star system
and don't find a signal doesn't tell you that there's no intelligent
life."
[The fact that no signal was received in the 8 hours of the
study should certainly not be disheartening to anyone. As Dr Shostak rightly
stated if you had aimed the same equipment at Earth 150 years ago you wouldn’t
have picked up anything either – which doesn’t actually prove that no
intelligent life existed here back then! It’s definitely a useful tool and a
useful technique to look for – and possibly find – intelligent life out there
but only life that has produced recognisable radio technology in the timeframe
being looked at. It would be very nice to get a positive result but I’m not
particularly holding my breath on this one – after all it’s a big-ass sky.]
No comments:
Post a Comment