Just Finished Reading: Five Weeks in a Balloon by Jules
Verne (FP: 1863)
In Early 1862 intrepid explorer Dr Samuel Fergusson, his
friend and determined sportsman Dick Kennedy and hid man-servant Joe set out
from the island of Zanzibar determined to cross the whole of Africa from east to
west by means of a hydrogen filled balloon. Where they will finally make
landfall is entirely in the hands of Providence and the skilful handling of the
balloon by Dr Fergusson himself. Along the way they must battle against a harsh
hot environment, hostile natives and bands of slavers, aggressive animals and
the ever present danger of being suspended under a balloon filled with
explosive gas! It is only through the dedicated application of science, common
sense and the very latest in weapons technology that they manage to make their
way across the Dark Continent. But real hazards exist and nothing worthwhile is
gained without a modicum of danger. Sacrifices are made in order for the expedition
to move forward, blood is split, sweat is required and in the final stages of
the flight it is down to every true Englishman to do his duty even at the cost
of his very life. Only in this way can the occupants of the balloon maintain
their superiority over the ignorant and superstitious natives who dog their
every step.
I believe this to be Verne’s first published
work presumably serialised in a magazine or newspaper as these things were back
then. There’s certainly enough cliff-hangers to keep people buying the next instalment
despite its short length – only 127 pages in my edition (‘edited for schools’
apparently although what was edited out escapes me). It certainly followed the
type of late 19th century novel I’m familiar with from Wells and
Conan Doyle amongst others (including Verne himself). What did surprise me more
than a little, though it shouldn’t have done really, was the sheer amount of
casual racism peppered throughout the pages. Practically on every page is a
casual comment on the inferiority of the African inhabitants – including Arab traders
– as compared to the obvious superiority of Europeans (particularly the British
and the French). Yet this ‘superiority seemed to be evidenced by shooting
everything that moved – especially if the creature was unknown to them – in order
to cook it over a handy fire to see what it tasted like. Likewise contact with
any native contingent seemed to be made more often by bullet than any attempt
at an actual dialogue. I winced more than once at the attitudes of the
balloons occupants. It’s possible that this was intended as satire but I have a
feeling that the book was intended to be much more of an adventure story than
something to elicit chuckles from under the bed sheets of young boys late at
night. Obviously it is difficult to judge novels of an earlier age by modern
standards – indeed reading such books allows us to see clearly how attitudes to
many things have changed in the intervening years – but I couldn’t help but
find this short novel to be more than a little distasteful. One for a Verne completest
only I think.
4 comments:
When you referred to it being edited for schoosl, I wondered if they'd cleaned up any of the racism...a thought that would give me mixed feelings. It would be nice to read some classic works without ocasionally being confronted by such unfortunate comments, but you don't want to take the text's teeth out, either...as 'clean' versions of Huckleberry Finn would be!
I have no idea what the 'editing' of this book entailed. It certainly didn't cut out the racism although maybe it cut it down a bit (but I doubt that!)
If I read a book I certainly expect it to be as the author intended and not 'cleaned up' for a modern audience with modern sensibilities. Times change, attitudes change and it is good to see that things have changed. It's easy to imagine that things have always been this way. Reading old books - both fiction and non-fiction - are good reminders that in years or ages gone people thought and acted differently and thought (just as we do) that they are enlightened individuals living at the pinnacle of their civilizations. It makes me wonder what future generations will think of us. I have a feeling that it won't be that flattering!
One hopes they'll be marveling at our ability to tolerate certain things now, instead of looking down at us because those things haven't yet become dominant.
Hopefully they'll be shocked at how violent and prejudiced we are - and be completely confused by our religions.
Post a Comment