About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Thursday, July 18, 2019


Just Finished Reading: The Vanquished – Why the First World War Failed to End, 1917-1923 by Robert Gerwarth (FP: 2016)

For those who had been there and had been fortunate enough to leave again it was known as the most dangerous place on Earth – Eastern Europe between 1917 and 1923. Whilst the victorious Powers of France, England and the USA returned to a state close enough to normal (or at least what passed for normal after 5 years of bloody conflict) those on the losing side as well as Italy with its “mutilated victory” descended into an era of political strife, uncertainty and civil war. With the great land Empires torn apart under the principle of ‘self-determination’ (largely undefined or even undefinable) the recently created and largely artificial new ‘nations’ attempted to solidify around a single ethnicity, culture or religion in a definable, defendable and rationale space – whilst often in direct conflict with their neigbours doing exactly the same thing. A few countries were relatively lucky with a historically agreed (and agreeable) border and a simple ethnic mix. Others, substantially less lucky, had borders than no army could defend and an ethnic mix so complex and so deeply historical that the locals themselves could not answer the simplest questions posed to them in plebiscites arranged in Paris. Families, neighbours, friends were torn asunder depending on church affiliation, accent or traditional dress. Before the ink was dry and the dust had time to settle the fighting started and before long the fighting was over something more than where a line was drawn on a map but who a people were and what kind of future – if any – they had in the new reality. Then it got nasty. Very nasty.

Across Russia revolution turned to Civil War, in Germany governments tottered on the edge of dissolution as Left fought Right in street battles and targeted political assassinations, in the Balkans where it all started a wave of ethnic ‘cleansing’ sept across the region resulting in mass expulsions and mass starvation. Further East in the remnants of the collapsing Ottoman Empire whilst the French and the British carved up vast areas to satisfy their imperial ambitions (and ignored by the anti-imperialist Americans) new forces arose to challenge the western narrative assumptions and began to fight back first against the victorious allies and then against the invading Greeks ending in the massacres of Smyrna as allied warships stood at anchor and did precisely nothing. The smug assertion that the war had ended in November 1918 was not even a sick joke to those in the East. They had forgotten how to laugh long before the war to end wars supposedly came to an end with a meaningless armistice ignored everywhere outside of the victorious powers. As the fighting rumbled on and countless lives were lost in massacre, famine, plague and political assassination the ground was being laid for an even greater conflict to come. One where the revolution stated in St Petersburg would engulf the world, were Germany would be vindicated and gain her rightful place in the world, where Italy would finally be given the empire and respect they deserved and where Japan would no longer be looked upon as inferior, foreign and sub-human.

Told with devastating frankness and with few punches pulled this is an eye-opening account of how the First World War most certainly did NOT end for the majority of Europeans (and beyond) in 1918 something I for one naively believed until fairly recently. The armistice may have stopped western armies fighting the central powers but it most certainly did not stop the fighting and destruction over huge tracks of land. It was not until a series of treaties signed in 1922 and 1923 that much of the fighting stopped simply because by then most of the survivors had, at least temporarily, managed to acquire most of what they wanted. A series of open sores across the world would need to be addressed by the new League of Nations once stability had been achieved which it had by 1926. Now, if only the nascent economic growth could be maintained for the next 10 years the world might have a chance to recover from its greatest calamity….. Whilst only 267 pages long this is still a heavy book (though by no means heavy going). I did feel more than once that I was wading through rivers of blood rather through words on a page but I guess that was the point. Vast in geographical scope it gives you an invaluable look at the disaster of World War One and why a mere 20 years later the world slipped into the Second World War. Unmissable for anyone interested in the end of one war, the beginning of the next and the often ignored turbulence in-between…. and for those who want more there’s a very impressive 62 page bibliography! Highly recommended to all 20th Century history buffs. 

9 comments:

Stephen said...

I'm planning on doing an Eastern Europe series after I do the Central-South America, and this sounds like an an obvious one to include!

CyberKitten said...

Oh, I think you'll REALLY like it. It is rather gruesome in places though. No sugar coating at all. It's also a very good look into the circumstances that gave rise to both Hitler and Mussolini. I though I knew both of their character arcs but I learnt things about both of them.... to say nothing about valuable insights into how Democracies fail.....

Brian Joseph said...

The book sounds fascinating. I have read a few books that get into the details of this also. Nail Ferguson’s The War of the World talked a lot about this. So did Henry Kissinger’s Diplomacy. Steven Pinker’s talked about how similar instability and horror was also going on in Asia at this time. He sees the entire period from about 1904, when the Russian Japanese War began, to 1953, when the Korean War ended, as one great, worldwide “hemoclysm”. Despite all the conflicts, mass murder and genocide that happened before and since, such deaths during this period skyrocketed but came dramatically down after 1953. Interesting but terrible stuff.

mudpuddle said...

"hemoclysm" ghastly... i'd date it from 5,00 bc to present, somewhere on the planet...

CyberKitten said...

@ Brian: I think you'd find it really interesting. I have a copy of the Ferguson book and the Kissinger book is on my 'interest' list. The whole of the 20th century has been particularly blood drenched way above the norm anytime before that. Of course with growing industrialisation comes war on an industrial scale too. Hopefully we'll never find out what a full on post-industrial war looks like!

@ Mudpuddle: We are indeed VERY good at killing our fellow man!

Judy Krueger said...

Most interesting! I would like to read this. I have three times begun and failed to finish Black Lamb and Grey Falcon by Rebecca West, in which she writes about this subject specifically set in Yugoslavia when she took a journey through that country in 1937. At 1150 pp, it is daunting and way beyond my knowledge of the time and area. Perhaps this one would be a good primer for me.

CyberKitten said...

@ Judy: It really does feel like I have had to track down anything about Europe between the Wars. This was one of the very few mainstream histories that I managed to find. Considering just how much was going on at the time - and how important it was to what came next - I'm astounded that whole libraries are not dedicated to the era.

mudpuddle said...

twice for me on Lamb and Falcon: her style really put me off... way too much like English upper class superiority...

Judy Krueger said...

Yes Mudpuddle, I know what you mean about the style, though I have read her novels and that is not there. I think she was writing this one for publication and felt she had to fit the style of the day for political discussion. In any case, it sure put her on the map!