Just Finished Reading: Wars of National Liberation by Daniel Moran (FP: 2001) [237pp]
The First World War started it, or at least the END of the War started it – that and President Wilson’s 14 Points and the universal political acid of ‘Self-Determination’. When the major European empires fell (or at the very least shuddered) the colonised around the world looked forward with hope to their independence. For many only disappointment lay ahead as the colonies of the vanquished were, by and large, handed over to the victors to run – most with the fiction of ‘Mandate’ status and the ‘eventual’ move to independence when they had achieved the requisite level of ‘maturity’ – judged by the Empire running things naturally. But what the First World War started the Second finished – by 1945 the Age of Empires was, effectively, over. Unfortunately that realisation wasn’t shared by everyone.
Exhausted by a second global conflict in 30 years the
British finally agreed to, slowly, let go of Empire. In a few places it needed
a nudge or two but eventually they did get out of the Imperial business. France
took a while longer to realise that the jig was definitely up and fought nasty
conflicts in North Africa and South East Asia (leaving the Americans to messily
finish things off in the 1970’s). Covering many of these conflicts – most of
which we are all too familiar with – this surprisingly good if short book looks
at wars across the world as local forces fought off their colonial masters and
others to achieve the long hoped for state of independence. Naturally things
were not often straight forward and the ultimate objectives both messy and
bloody. The post-war world after 1945 was the world of superpowers in proxy
conflicts and both sides used the wars of national liberation to kick the other
side whenever possible or politically acceptable.
3 comments:
Interesting. In my concentrated reading of fiction from 1940 on, I have come across all of these wars. Also when reading more current translated lit the wars come up again from the viewpoint of the countries who waged them.
Your labels for this post are 10 deep!
so... is the default status of new nations dictatorship?
@ Judy: I should have something from most of the regions coming up in both fiction and non-fiction. Yes, LOTS of labels as there was a lot of ground covered here! I aim at at least 3 but 10 was unusual.
@ Mudpuddle: It does seem that way doesn't it. Partially because a 'strong' leader overthrew the existing regime plus no history/experience of multi-party politics and peaceful transferal of power.
Post a Comment