Appeal for emergency Government funding to support churches
The Bishop of London has said that some of England's oldest churches are in such disrepair that they will close without an emergency cash injection of £60 million. The Rt Rev Richard Chartres yesterday urged the Government to increase grants to repair and maintain "some of our most medieval jewels", reports the Daily Telegraph.
As churches struggle with declining congregations they face an annual repair bill estimated at £120 million, with a backlog of repairs totalling £373 million. The bishop said: "There is a real question whether the achievements of the tens of thousands of volunteers who help to maintain our churches are sustainable. "If no extra money is forthcoming we will see a spate of church closures and losses to whole communities of buildings that cannot be sustained.
"The Church of England is responsible for 45 per cent of the Grade I listed buildings in the country and it is time that the Government recognised the vital role played by local churches in communities across the country." Bishop Chartres will present a paper to the General Synod next month outlining the crisis facing the Church of England as a result of a fall in repair grants from English Heritage and the Heritage Lottery Fund. The Bishop compared the £26 million grant it has received this year to spend on its 13,000 listed churches with the £23.1 million grant the Arts Council gives to the Royal Opera House alone.
He called on the Government to recognise that the role of churches today went far beyond the worshipping community. Besides benefiting Christians, they were a venue for mother and child groups, judo classes, amateur dramatics and food fairs. "In rural areas, the church building can often be the only one available for community use when schools, shops, pubs have gone," he said. "The potential of church buildings to help deliver essential services in rural areas is only starting to be realised." The Church of England has long said that the Government's role in maintaining churches falls far short of the levels provided in other European countries. In the absence of sufficient Government funding, historic churches seek money from donations, campaigns and bodies such as English Heritage.
English Heritage said it was committed to securing the future of historic churches and was conducting research to identify ways to raise congregation numbers. A spokesman said: "We agree that the £26 million per year available for repairs to listed places of worship under the joint English Heritage and Heritage Lottery Fund places of worship scheme is not enough but this is currently the limit of our funds for this repair scheme. "The results of this research will enable us to identify how best to keep our parish churches alive and thriving and help us to make a cast iron case to the Government for greater financial support." The story in the newspaper accompanies an editorial which suggests that the maintenance of church fabric is "too much of a job for the established Church."
"The Government must take this burden upon itself, for the sake of the nation, to save these incomparable landmarks of its culture" the paper says. The Church of England has assets and land worth over £4 billion, which others say the church should sell in order to raise funds to support its creaking infrastructure. However the church has recently found itself in hot water over the proposed sale of some of the housing that it owns.
Well, that’s certainly an indication of the state of religion (at least in the Church of England) in this country. Although it cannot fail to warm my heart I do find myself slightly disturbed by the idea that often beautiful pieces of architecture are falling so far into disrepair.
2 comments:
hmmm, I have put a great deal of thought into this over the years, wanting to preserve historical buildings, but not wanting my taxes to support an already wealthy religion.
I tend to vacillate a bit, but I think that public funds should only be available if the building is no longer used for religious services. While it houses (and is owned by) a specific religion, it should be up to that rligious body to maintain it. A straight forward "listed building" order will ensure that they do so.
I know the buildings are used by other people in the community, but to be honest there is no shortage of small meeting hall space in the country, and the fact that I have a parents coffee morning at my place every thursday (I don't BTW) would not entitle me to publuc funds!
The Church of England is NOT impoverished. It owns 123,000 acres of land in England, recieving rent income from most of it. they have assets worth more than £4billion (2005), and made a £100 million a year for the past 10 years (!) from property sales. Over those past 10 years, they have averaged a 11.1% return on their investmants. source
You know Mrs A.. We really have to stop agreeing with each other so much. It's getting spooky.
I'm certainly against the Government (in other words us poor tax payers) giving money to the Church in order that it can maintain its run-down buildings. If it doesn't want to spend its enormous wealth on maintenance then why should we? If we lose a few listed buildings in the process so be it.
If religion is falling into disrepair in this country I certainly don't think that our taxes should be used to slow its decline.
Post a Comment