About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Saturday, February 25, 2006

I'm an atheist - so what?

By ROBYN E. BLUMNER, Times Perspective Columnist Published August 8, 2004

"What is it," asked German philosopher Friedrich Neitzche, "is man only a blunder of God, or God only a blunder of man?" I vote for the latter. Though I was brought up in a religious faith, it was at a very young age - preteen - that I realized I had no belief in God and no amount of indoctrination was going to change that. This sense of nonbelief has been so strong and abiding throughout my life that I find it virtually impossible to understand the psyches of people who believe in anything supernatural.

Just to be clear, it is not just God that I can't fathom. I also reject the existence of Satan or any form of afterlife beyond the redistribution of the body's matter. In my book there are no ghosts, golems, angels or spirits. I do not believe in psychic power, astrology or predestination - and forget about karma, kismet or crystals. My view is that the "soul" does not exist outside a functioning brain, nothing was "meant to be," and things that seem inexplicable are not miracles or paranormal experiences, they are simply not yet explained.

I have never understood why the fallback position to unanswerable questions about the universe is that an all-powerful, all-knowing being intervened. To me, "we don't know yet" is a fine response. I don't expect to be applauded for these views since they are out of step with the majority of Americans, but neither should I be despised for them. Yet, I will be. I can already imagine the torrent of hate mail, with readers accusing me of all sorts of vile human derangements just because I subscribe to reason and logic to explain the world rather than faith. As an atheist I am a member of the last minority group that is still subject to open and acceptable derision and discrimination. The depths of this hostility was on display at a Tampa City Council meeting recently when three council members walked out rather than be present when an atheist gave the invocation. Kevin White, an African-American on the council, first tried to get the invocation canceled. When that failed he and the two Hispanic members of the council left the room. They showed a shocking lack of tolerance for diversity and difference, considering they too are members of historically excluded groups.

White went on to suggest that it was demonstrably dangerous to hear an atheist speak. He said it could unleash a "snowball effect" on government and compared it to engaging in unprotected sex. Huh? Does he mean that appealing to the rational mind rather than a supreme being is so inherently persuasive that it could catch on? Well, it has. What White may not know is that a far larger percentage of his constituency are already non-believers than he suspects. A 2001 survey conducted by the Graduate Center of the City University of New York found that more than 29-million adult Americans say they identify with no religion. Of those, more than 6-million said they didn't believe in God. Compare that to the number of adult Americans who say they are Jewish (2.8-million), Muslim (1.1-million), Unitarian (600,000) or Buddhist (1.1-million). If national statistics equate even in broad terms to Tampa, then inviting Unitarian and Muslim speakers to give the inspirational words to begin the council meeting represents the views of many fewer residents than inviting atheists to do so.

White doesn't know about the mainstreaming of atheism because atheists don't tend to stand up for themselves. They have been relegated to a closet that is darker and deeper than that in which gays and lesbians find themselves. Certainly in the public sphere, announcing one's atheism is the kiss of political death. According to a 1999 Gallup Poll, half of Americans say they would refuse to vote for an atheist candidate solely on that basis. During this year's oral arguments in the U.S. Supreme Court case challenging the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance, atheist dad and attorney Michael Newdow got into a telling exchange with Chief Justice William Rehnquist. When Newdow suggested that having a religious phrase in the pledge is divisive, pointing to the uproar the case had caused throughout the country, Rehnquist had him admit that Congress unanimously agreed to add the words "under God" in 1954. "That doesn't sound divisive," said Rehnquist. To which Newdow replied, "That's only because no atheist can get elected to public office." The courtroom gallery broke into spontaneous applause at this clever, apt rejoinder.

Today, there are still eight states that have provisions in their state constitutions explicitly barring atheists from holding political office. The Tennessee Constitution states: "No person who denies the being of God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this state." These restrictions are no longer enforceable, but the language remains on the books. No legislator is interested in suggesting their removal. America is a country steeped in religion and as such I expect to be bombarded by it. I take no issue with the right of religious people to proselytize, to erect houses of worship on every corner or to broadcast their fervor on television and radio. All I ask in return is a little consideration for the millions of us who don't join in the "good news." My faith is in mankind and the marvels accomplished by human ingenuity and drive. Why that makes me a pariah to White and others like him is beyond my ken. It certainly says more about them than me.

15 comments:

Sadie Lou said...

You should do Jewish Atheist's challenge. It was good for me.

CyberKitten said...

sadie lou said: You should do Jewish Atheist's challenge. It was good for me.

I noticed and was suitably impressed. However, I do feel that I would just be making a meaningless gesture....

Sadie Lou said...

You won't know until you try. Afterwards, you could tell us what you gleened from the experiment, if anything.

goal10der said...

I thoroughly identified with everything in this article.

I hate having to hide my atheism, especially from my dad! I actually think he would be more accepting if I were gay.

I had a conversation with my best friend last summer about how an atheist could never get elected to a government office. He, a catholic, told me that I was wrong, as long as they stood by their issues and ran a clean campaign, they could appeal to both sides of the aisle. Obviously, he was slightly delusional! I told him that if more people thought like he did, then our country would be run completely different, but until then, he needed to get his head out of his ---.

There is no way an atheist will ever be elected, period.

Juggling Mother said...

The reason atheists don't speak up for their "faith" in the way theists do is because their is no "saving" to be done. Theists feel it is their responsibility to spread the word, so that as many people as possible can find happiness in the afterlife. Atheists don't really care what you want to believe, since it doesn't make any difference once you're dead.

It's also why (fundy) theists find it so difficult to debate with atheists - because they don't believe we are not trying to convert them!

BTW - what challenge? I'm off to check it out.

Sadie Lou said...

I vote for an atheist if their morals and values lined up with my own--which what I look for in any candiate.

goal10der said...

sadie lou said - I vote for an atheist if their morals and values lined up with my own--which what I look for in any candiate.

if this is true, then I'd applaud you for looking beyond what most people see when they hear the word atheist. Just a note on this, it puts you in the minority in your thinking - welcome to the club.

however, how can their morals line up with yours if they dont share your religious views? aren't most peoples morals based through their religion (even though personally, I don't believe you need to have religion to have morals)?

CyberKitten said...

goal10der said: I thoroughly identified with everything in this article.

Me too. Which is why I posted it [grin]

goal10der also said: I hate having to hide my atheism, especially from my dad! I actually think he would be more accepting if I were gay.

I still can't get over how different our two countries are.

goal10der said...

CK said - I still can't get over how different our two countries are.

especially considering we were once you - a long, long, time ago, in a galaxy far, far away!

It's amazing how individually unique America is compared to the rest of the world. Some countries, you could leave, go into a neighboring country and never know you left/entered somewhere new. Here, we are so vastly different from city to city and state to state, let alone from other countries!

By the way, the comment about my dad was not indicative of my relationship with him. He is one of my best friends as well as a great father, but this one thing would put a rift through all of that and I'm willing to forgo the truth about my religious views to keep that relationship. Maybe it isn't exactly ideal, but since I'm not worried about it coming back to haunt me in an afterlife, I deal with it!

CyberKitten said...

goal10der said: especially considering we were once you - a long, long, time ago, in a galaxy far, far away!

Indeed. I was thinking that too. Maybe it's because you're a Continent rather than a country? And as you say *so* diverse... Maybe its because you're just *so* damned young too? [bg]

There's probably a PhD in that question....

JR said...

Hmmm, I know I'd have no trouble voting for an athiest because I have before. He didn't get elected though. :-( As for morals, I don't believe in killing or stealing, not because God or a religion says it's wrong, but because I think it is wrong. I wouldn't want someone stealing from me or killing me, therefore, it's wrong for me. Even though I believe in a God, I don't attend church. I do believe in that whole "do unto others" as my guideline for what is right or wrong, not because I believe in Heaven, Karma, etc., but more self-centeredly, if it harms me, it's not good for me, and likely not good for others. That said, I don't get the hatred of athiests or understand why people wouldn't vote for them. Do they confuse "godlessness" with "god less ness?" Meaning, the absence of a belief in god, with the absence of human decency? Anyway, let me hear your platform CK, and who knows, I might vote for you.
:-)

CyberKitten said...

V V said: Anyway, let me hear your platform CK, and who knows, I might vote for you.
:-)

Oh, I'm pretty sure you wouldn't like some of my 'platform'... [grin]. But thanks for the support!

Juggling Mother said...

Ooooh, a CK Utopian World post - that'd be fun:-)

From the comments I've recieved & blogs I've read, yes, theists totally confuse godlessness with god less ness. I've been told many times that it is impossible to have any morals without religion - as though we only do things out of fear about our afterlife!

CyberKitten said...

Mrs A said: Ooooh, a CK Utopian World post - that'd be fun:-)

Maybe.... One day, when I'm feeling brave....... [grin]

Doctor Marco said...

In Peru, in 1990, we were close to elect an agnostic as president. Vargas Llosa's agnosticism was never an issue in the campaign. In Chile, Michelle Bachelet, a divorced agnostic woman has been elected president. I wonder why the in the US there is more difficulty to accept differences.