Religious Fanaticism Out of Control
by Dave Zweifel for the Madison Capital Times
March 21, 2006
In case you're still not sure just how destructive the Bush administration has become to this country, you need to read Michael Specter's piece in the March 13 issue of the New Yorker magazine. It's enough to give you the willies. Specter documents how the Bush people have stacked the Food and Drug Administration with fanatics who regularly trump science to advance their own religious beliefs. It reads like a modern-day Galileo being persecuted by the Catholic Church because he maintained Earth was round. Although Specter cites several examples of religious beliefs thwarting scientific advances by key appointees to the FDA and other divisions of the Department of Health and Human Services (Tommy Thompson's old department), one of the most egregious has been to block a vaccine designed to thwart cervical cancer.
Two of the country's bigger pharmaceutical companies Merck and GlaxoSmithKline have developed and proven the safety of a vaccine that prevents a common sexually transmitted disease called human papillomavirus (HPV). Strains of HPV are known to cause cervical cancer in early adulthood. The vaccine needs to be administered to girls before they become sexually active, which is an average age of 17. And therein lies the rub for the religious base of the Republican Party that George Bush and company have installed in crucial posts in the health department. That base and George W. Bush himself steadfastly adheres to the proposition that kids need to practice abstinence. In their eyes, anything from promoting the use of condoms to giving young girls vaccinations against sexually transmitted diseases only encourages promiscuity among young people.
These people refuse to believe results of the numerous scientific studies that have shown the availability of condoms, for instance, has absolutely no impact on the rate of teen sex, or that young people who pledge to abstain actually engage in sex as often as those who don't take a pledge. Their religion maintains that premarital sex is a sin, period, which is fine except that Bush has created a situation where those overzealous religious beliefs instead of scientific fact determine national policy. "Since George W. Bush became president, the United States has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on abstinence programs, and it has cut almost that much in aid to groups that support abortion and the use of condoms as a primary method of birth control," Specter pointed out.
But, who would believe they would actually block approval of a vaccine that can prevent cancer? The role that religion is playing in important health decisions has caused several career FDA doctors and staff to quit their jobs in disgust. It isn't just an insane war. It's the anti-environment policies, the unjust tax policies, the ceaseless trashing of civil liberties and the subjugation of solid medical science for religious zealotry that is tearing down an America that was based on fairness and truth. Can we really survive nearly three more years of this destruction?
9 comments:
Well, that'll teach those promiscuous wenches! They can all get cervical cancer! Unbelievable. What's amazing about all this is just how hypocritical it all is. I have a hard time believing that little Bush junior spent his youth as a chaste altar boy (unless, perhaps, the women simply couldn't put up with his smugness and ignorance).
God doesn't want women to have and enjoy sex (at least the god of the right wing). Neither do most of the men in U.S. government.
I'm still struggling with the idea that having sex, especially having sex that's fun, is in some way a 'bad thing'. Though it seems that it's only really 'bad' when women are actually enjoying it too.
I wonder if a vaccine similar to this, but meant for teenage boys so they wouldn't get prostate cancer would have met with the same roadblocks? It's the same mentality you see with insurance companies refusing to cover birth control pills, yet willing to cover viagra. It's still a man's world. Oh, and no, I don't really think we can survive three more years of this shit. We are in desperate need of an uprising across all socio-economic, religious, political, etc. fronts. Where do I sign up?
Maybe we need to start handing out Guy Fawkes masks....? [grin]
(A reference to 'V for Vendetta' if you haven't seen it yet)
"with insurance companies refusing to cover birth control pills, yet willing to cover viagra"
Do what?!
Shit the US scares me - and the more I learn, the more scared I get!
We have seen tomorrow and it looks a hell of a lot like yesterday.
Mrs. A., Yep, I'd heard about it from people, but wasn't quite sure what to believe until my own insurance company pulled that with me (and its a MAJOR insurance company in the U.S.). I was prescribed birth control pills for endometriosis, not to prevent pregnancy, and my insurer automatically rejected it, twice! They thought it was for birth control, which they don't find "medically necessary." Even when my doctor got on the phone with them and yelled at them, they still thought we were trying to pull a fast one. I got on the phone and said, "listen, I'm a lesbian with endometriosis, this is not for birth control." I finally got my coverage. After discussing this with friends, they said, I'll bet you they'll cover Viagra though. Still a Doubting Thomas, I called to find out and sure enough, Viagra was considered "medically necessary." Why was it considered medically necessary? Simply on the assumption that if a doctor prescribed it, it must be medically necessary. Yet when I questioned why that assumption didn't hold true for birth control, they didn't have any good answers, only that their board set the policy for what would be covered and what would not. And on that board what do you find? Middle-aged to elderly white men.
That is truely bizarre.... unless you look at it from the point of old guys... who sit on medical boards.....
Post a Comment