About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Friday, October 27, 2006

Tiny fossils reveal inner secrets

By Jonathan Fildes for BBC News

Friday, 13 October 2006

The exact moment when a 550 million year old cell began to divide has been captured in an exquisite 3-D image. The picture is one of a series taken by researchers examining ancient fossil embryos from Guizhou Province, China. The specimens, described in the journal Science, are the oldest known examples of fossil embryos, and shed light on the early evolution of complex life. Scientists used an advanced X-ray technique to peer inside the balls of cells to reveal the structures inside. "We have been able to tease apart every structure, geological or biological," said Professor Phil Donoghue of the University of Bristol in the UK and one of the team who worked on the 162 pristine specimens.

The tiny fossils are part of the Doushantuo Formation in South China, a limestone bed deposited between 635 and 551 million years ago that contains layers composed almost entirely of fossil embryos. The team behind the research believe the fossils are the developing offspring of extremely primitive sponge-like creatures.

To resolve the delicate internal structures, the scientists used a technique known as microfocus x-ray computed tomography (microCT). The method allowed the team to construct 3-D images of the tiny fossils. Computer software was then used to analyse individual cells. "We digitally extracted each cell from the embryos and then looked inside the cells," said Shuhai Xiao of Virginia Tech University in the US. Inside, the team found kidney-shaped structures which they believe could be nuclei or other subcellular components. "It is amazing that such delicate biological structures can be preserved in such an ancient deposit," said Professor Xiao. In some four-celled embryos, each cell had two of the kidney-shaped structures, suggesting they were caught in the process of splitting prior to cell division.

Although the bed is packed full of the tiny fossils, the team has been unable to find any adult specimens. Previous research has suggested that the embryos were the product of complex animals, the ancestors of modern organisms. If true, this would suggest that complex multi-cellular life got started much earlier than previously thought, prior to the "Cambrian Explosion" 542 million years ago. At this time, fossils record a dramatic change in animal diversity with many of today's modern groups suddenly making an appearance. Some researchers believe that the Cambrian Explosion marked the emergence of modern animal life. Although complex animals had started evolving before 542 million years ago their development accelerated at this point. Others maintain that complex animals lived long before this event and that the period just marks a time of exceptional fossil preservation. The Doushantuo formation is important because it gives a window into the time leading up to the Cambrian and the new analysis goes some way towards resolving the dispute.

Using the microCT technique to analyse late stage embryos, with up to 1,000 cells, the team was able to gain insights into the creature that produced them. Although the cells show some modern traits they crucially lack others. "Even in these late-stage embryos there is no evidence of the formation of a tissue layer," said Dr Donoghue. "You would expect to see that in modern embryos, even those of sponges." The team believes the cells probably came from extremely simple creatures. "They would have developed into sponge-like creatures, but more primitive," said Dr. Donoghue. If right, this means that the Cambrian Explosion theory for the origin of complex animal life would still stand "This work provides a constraint on when advanced groups evolved," Dr Donoghue said.

2 comments:

dbackdad said...

Pretty cool.

CyberKitten said...

r10b - I always find it rather surprising when people tell me that they don't 'believe' in Evolution. To me its like saying you don't believe in Gravity. To me there is nothing to believe. The facts are there, the theory is sound and, to me at least, make a whole heap of sense - certainly far and away more sense than so-called Intelligent Design which personally I consider the biggest crock and belly laugh I know of outside (but only just) of mainstream Religion.

The tree analogy you pointing to is a vast over simplification in the same way as the Solar system model of the atom is. Evolution is a little more complex than that.

Of course there is debate and dispute about Evolution! It's science afterall. Its not going to stand still. Darwin didn't know anything about Genetics for example and probably got things wrong. Much of the debate takes the form about arguing about the details and processes of Evolution rather than the possibility that the whole thing is wrong. There is far too much evidence to support the Theory of Evolution and certainly not anything like the evidence to overturn it.

The Cambrian Explosion is interesting though I don't know enough about the details to argue too much about it but it could be (as stated in the article) that "the period just marks a time of exceptional fossil preservation". After all fossils are rare beasts at the best of times - when you find a whole lot together its going to look pretty much like an explosion.

No doubt Evolutionary science will move a few inches forward whenever future discoveries are made. That is how science works.