Two-thirds of Britons not religious, suggests survey
John McManus for BBC News
21 March 2011
Nearly two-thirds of people do not regard themselves as
"religious", a new survey carried out to coincide with the 2011
Census suggests. The British Humanist Association (BHA), which commissioned the
poll, said people often identified themselves as religious for cultural
reasons. The online poll asked 1,900 adults in England and Wales a question which
is on this month's census form.
While 61% of the poll's respondents said they did belong to
a religion, 65% of those surveyed answered "no" to the further
question: "Are you religious?" Two surveys were commissioned, one
covering England and Wales , and the other for Scotland . The
Scottish survey was commissioned by the Humanist Society of Scotland. South of
the border, 61% of respondents said they did have a religion. But only 29% also
said they were religious, while 65% said they were not. Among respondents who
identified themselves as Christian, fewer than half said they believed Jesus
Christ was a real person who died, came back to life and was the son of God.
Another 27% said they did not believe that at all, while 25% were unsure. In Scotland ,
42% of respondents said they did not belong to a religion, yet in a further
question "Are you religious?" 56% answered "no". The BHA
has complained the wording of the optional census question about religion
encourages people to wrongly identify themselves as believers. In the last
census in 2001, 72% of people were classed as Christians - a figure which is
much higher than other surveys. The BHA believes people might tick
"yes" to the census question on religion for reasons of cultural
identity.
The chief executive of the BHA, Andrew Copson, is running a
national campaign encouraging non-religious people to state their unbelief
clearly on their census forms.He said: "This poll is further evidence for a key
message of the Census Campaign - that the data produced by the census, used by local and
national government as if it indicates religious belief and belonging, is in
fact highly misleading. The humanists say data which might indicate a greater
amount of religious belief than actually exists, is being used to justify faith
schools, and the continuing presence of Anglican bishops in the House of Lords.
The Office for National Statistics has defended the wording of the religion
question. A spokesman told the BBC: "The religion question measures the
number of people who self-identify an affiliation with a religion, irrespective
of the extent of their religious belief or practice." The think tank
Theos, which undertakes research into religious matters, says attempting to
measure cultural affiliation to religion - rather than actual, regular practice
- is a good idea, as it shows the broad values society shares. It also disputes
the BHA's assertion that the collected data is used for political purposes.
[I never really trust statistics – at least not from various
surveys attempting to discover the religious make-up of the country. They all
come back with different figures which makes me believe that none of them are
representative. From personal experience I know very few people who would come
out and declare their faith in any of the major religions. Of course this might
be very much a self-selecting group and religion is never a common topic for
discussion. Faith, of any kind, is usually seen as a personal issue and is
hardly discussed even amongst friends. Pushing a religious position is
considered to be rude and maybe even the height of rudeness. What the true
level of faith is in England
is anyone’s guess. Personally I find it difficult to believe that 72% of the
population believe in God. I find it almost as difficult to believe that 65% do
not. I do think that non-belief is on the rise though. Generation by generation
less people throughout Europe attend church, get baptised, join religious
orders, and just about any other way of measuring religious observance. All of
the indicators are, apparently irresistibly, on a downward trend. Long may it
continue.]
5 comments:
How do you define "pushing a religious position"?
~S
It's odd, because back in Italy I only knew about two or three REALLY CONVINCED and PRACTICING christians.
Since coming to England, I've met about five or six. All doing my same course. And every one of them a true blue 'Jesus loves you' and 'Thank you God' christian at that.
Seriously, what the hell?
Sadie said: How do you define "pushing a religious position"
Unwanted preaching in the workplace for instance or knocking at your door trying to sell you a particular religious point of view. I've had a little bit of both. Sometimes I engage with the person, sometimes I make fun of them or sometimes (depending on my mood) I'm moderately rude.
TF said: Since coming to England, I've met about five or six. All doing my same course. And every one of them a true blue 'Jesus loves you' and 'Thank you God' christian at that. Seriously, what the hell?
I met a few dedicated Christians @ Uni but we generally knew who they were right off the bat. Mostly they left the rest of us alone knowing what our reaction would be.
Does Southampton have a particularly large Christian/religious community? I certainly haven't heard of it being particularly religious...
They have a pretty active christian union. Thankfully they don't preach AT me, but they sometimes bring up jesus or *remind* me of their faith.
We had a fairly large (comparatively) Christian Union @ my College in Lancaster. They did kind of keep themselves to themselves though! I actually went along to some of their meetings (yes, there was a girl involved) but my skepticism and constant questioning was a bit much for them.... [grin]
Post a Comment