I’ve had a ‘thing’ about the Samurai for as long as I can
remember. To me they have always seemed to be the epitome of the warrior
culture and I cannot help but admire them – or at least their image. So you can
imagine how much I was excited by a big budget movie about them coming to a
screen near me. The story Hollywood chose to portray was the clash between
the new and the old ways of doing things. On the side of the new where the
industrialists who wanted to bring Japan kicking and screaming into the 19th
century – the film takes place in the 1870’s – whilst on the side of the old
ways are the Samurai who look back to their historical roots and who choose the
way of the sword rather than the way of the gun. The leader of the Samurai
rebels (based it seems on the Satsuma Rebellion of 1877) is the charismatic
Katsumoto played by the equally charismatic Ken Watanabe. Hired to train a
modern army to defeat him is Indian War hero Captain Nathan Algren (played
creditably by Tom Cruise) who is slowly drinking himself to death in an attempt
to forget his part in a massacre of innocent Indian tribes. Having the attitude
that he will go anywhere and kill anyone for money he gladly signs up for the
assignment not really caring one way or the other. On reaching Japan Algren
begins to realise that he is in a very foreign land and attempts to get to know
his enemy. When, against his advice, his unready troops are forced into
premature battle Algren is wounded and captured by Katsumoto’s men. Also
wanting to understand his enemy Katsumoto brings Algren to his mountain village
where they begin to learn about each other’s ways and slowly begin to admire
each other. It is not long before Algren’s allegiance shifts in favour of his former
enemy and he begins to use his knowledge of modern fighting techniques to give
the last Samurai at least a fighting chance.
Although a Samurai rebellion against increasing Japanese
modernisation did happen around the time the film is based it was, not
surprisingly, a wholly Japanese affair. The modernising forces did use western
military technology but did not employ ‘military advisors’ in anything like the
modern sense. Of course to sell the idea to hard-headed money men in Hollywood
there needed to be an American presence that the audience could identify with –
hence Cruise. But we really shouldn’t expect documentary accuracy from our
movies so this didn’t bother me in the least. What bothered me more was the
fact the Cruise (OK a decorated and experienced fighting man of the age)
apparently picked up not only Samurai culture but their fighting techniques to
such an extent – in 3 months – that he managed to defeat four sword wielding
Ronin whilst he himself was (temporarily at least) unarmed. OK, it was a pretty
good fight scene but was more than a little unrealistic to say the least. What
bothered me most though was the end. Not the big battle scene which was very
well done but the scene where Cruise basically reminds the Japanese Emperor
(the Emperor!!!) what it means to be Japanese! I really don’t think that the
word arrogance even begins to cover it!
6 comments:
Never saw it, both because Cruise can be a tough pill for me to swallow and because I'm slow to grasp the vibe of samurai culture (odd, because I'm intrigued by gangster culture, especially during our Prohibition days).
I'll have to add it to my list!
I did like this movie, for many of the same reasons you said. And I do think this is one of Cruise's better roles. It certainly helps working across from the great Ken Watanabe.
And the cinematographer John Toll knows how to film a fight scene, having previously done Braveheart.
Gorgeous film, and I do love it, despite it using the white guy to the rescue of the poor primitives formula. I tend to focus more on the redemption that the white guy experiences in this type of film. Ken Watanabe is just amazing.
Bill said: Cruise can be a tough pill for me....
Me too. I certainly wouldn't rush to see a film just because he was in it.
Bill said: I'm slow to grasp the vibe of samurai culture....
It's quite fascinating as well as passing strange - basically its very much an alien cultural thing. Some of it seems to be awesome while other bits are just bizarre. I think much of what we see of it in the West is heavily romanticized though.
Bill said: I'm intrigued by gangster culture, especially during our Prohibition days.
Ditto. The Mob is *much* easier to understand than the Samurai or even the Yakuza.
dbackdad said: It certainly helps working across from the great Ken Watanabe.
He is great isn't he?
dbackdad said: And the cinematographer John Toll knows how to film a fight scene, having previously done Braveheart.
That certainly explains a lot. Especially seeing how well the end battle was executed with all of those extras!
Mike said: despite it using the white guy to the rescue of the poor primitives formula...
That did get a few eye-rolls from me. I can understand why they did it but it still feels more than a little insulting!
Mike said: I tend to focus more on the redemption that the white guy experiences in this type of film.
That's definitely a major theme here.
Mike said: Ken Watanabe is just amazing.
He has an *amazing* amount of gravitas. I can totally see him as a leader of Samurai.
I really like this film as well. Definitely one of Cruise's best performances (he's very good in Minority Report too). Love the cinematography and general atmosphere of the film, as well as how it doesn't really resolve the tension between the western moral code and the bushido. The whole conversation they have about General Custer is never capped off with one or the other saying 'gee, you were right, I was wrong silly me', which I admire. They set that difference aside and focus on the cultural aspects they DO share. Thus leaving the message open to interpretation, whilst simultaneously giving closure to Cruise and Watanabe's characters.
That's a good point about Custer. Was he an idiot who led his men to their death due to him being a glory hound or did he die a samurai's death facing great odds? It's sometimes all in the cultural interpretation.
One of my favourite bits was the fight in the rain with the training swords - not because of the fight itself but because of the way the samurai completed disregarded the weather as if it was beneath them or that they simply didn't notice anything so mundane.
Post a Comment