From The BBC
6 April 2015
Young people should be forced to vote in the first election after they turn 18, a centre-left think tank has said. Making them vote may halt declining election turnouts and could "kick start the habit of a lifetime", the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) said. In 2010, 44% of 18 to 24-year-olds voted, with the "younger and poorer" least likely to vote, it suggested.
The UK risks "sleepwalking into a more divided democracy" unless there is reform, the IPPR's Mat Lawrence said. "The working class and the young have less input into political decision-making processes, with lower rates of participation and representation than older and more affluent citizens," the IPPR report suggested. Such inequalities undermined the "legitimacy and effectiveness" of democracy, the report claimed, saying it was unlikely the trend would be reversed in next month's general election.
At the 1970 general election, the gap between the proportion of 18-24 year olds and over-65s who voted was 18%. However, at the 2010 general election, the gap had risen to 32% - with 76% of over-65s voting, compared to 44% of 18-24 year olds. "Long-run decline in voter turnout in the UK is being driven by the relative collapse in participation among the young and the less well-off - not by a uniform decline in turnout among all groups," Mr Lawrence added. "A distinctive non-voting population, generally younger and poorer, heightens political inequality by giving some groups far greater influence at the ballot box."
The report comes after the voting age was reduced to 16 for the Scottish independence referendum, in September - when 109,593 16 and 17-year-olds registered to vote. Mr Lawrence said the high turnout at the referendum, as well as the rise of grassroots groups, provided reasons for optimism.
Broadcaster and author Rick Edwards told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that he supported the proposal, saying "something drastic needs to happen" to encourage young people to vote. But he said there would have to be a "none of the above" option on ballot papers, to allow voters to express their dissatisfaction. "The problem is politicians are more interested in serving the interests of the demographic who vote more because they are interested in winning their votes and keeping their votes. Therefore what is happening is that young people are getting marginalised and their interests aren't being served as they should be," he added. He said that if young people felt they were not being spoken to, or were not being paid any attention by politicians, they would be even less likely to vote.
[Of course, rather inevitably and equally rather sadly, they’re looking at it arse backwards. The reason why an increasing number of people don’t vote in local or national elections has little to do with what is often referred to as ‘voter apathy’. I think the reason why people don’t bother voting (which I believe to be a positive act rather than a negative one) is that many of our politicians are simply unworthy of receiving our votes. What politicians and others seem to struggle with is the fact that they are unworthy – because their belief in themselves cannot conceive of such a straightforward answer to the fact of dropping voter engagement. Of course such ‘disengagement’ is shown to be false by events such as the recent Scottish Referendum where people turned out in unprecedented numbers – simply because they believed that the result of the vote mattered. In contrast the results of local elections particularly (where voting numbers can be embarrassingly low) and even in General Elections the result can be viewed as largely irrelevant. As the old saying goes, no matter who you vote for you still get a Government. These days there seems little to distinguish one ‘side’ for the other when ideology is sacrificed in the appeal to the greatest number and where today’s election pledges are tomorrow’s unapologetic irrelevancies. Voting numbers will go up when people feel that their vote matters. Until that day voting will continue to decline and so-called Think Tanks will come up with increasingly stupid and desperate ‘answers’ to this non-problem.]
No comments:
Post a Comment