About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Thursday, February 20, 2020


Just Finished Reading: The Death Maze by Ariana Franklin (FP: 2008)

England, Winter 1172. The Rose of the World, Rosamund Clifford, is dead – poisoned. The prime suspect is lover’s wife. Her lover is Henry II, King of England. His wife is Eleanor of Aquitaine, one of the most powerful women in Christian Europe. If the rumours are true, or even if they are believed by enough people, the country could quickly descend into Civil War. But if Eleanor is innocent there is something far more dangerous abroad than a woman scorned. At the heart of the kingdom are those willing to manipulate the monarchy for their own ends no matter the consequences for the country. But how to get to the bottom of things? Bishop Rowley has just an investigator in mind. Brilliant, incisive, educated, fluent in languages and knowledgeable of the way of the world – plus the mother of his illegitimate daughter. Adelia Aguilar is this and more. University educated in Seville, Italy she is a speaker for the dead, able to their story from the evidence left behind when their spirit left them. Some regard her skills with suspicion (whispering witchcraft), others regard them with distain because of her sex, and a few regard them with fear as she closes in on those who would kill to get their way and silence those who oppose them.

I will be the first to admit that 12th century England is most definitely not my ‘specialist subject’. So I had to let at least some of the historical references fly by me. I suppose that I could have Googled my way through the book checking facts or word usage as they arose but that’s hardly conducive to enjoyment of a novel. Apart from the enormous elephant in the room things seemed, at least on the face of things, reasonable enough to let it slide. My pedant alarm did go off once or twice – not too loudly – but I think it felt somewhat overwhelmed by the central character in the novel to show much more than a muted grumbling. Now (again) I’d be the first to admit that the main character Adelia is excellent, she has enough depth and more than enough humanity and human failings to make her interesting. She’s a good person whose focus is on helping people, making the world a better place and bringing up her infant daughter safely. I liked her – a lot. BUT, oh BUT, the idea that a 12th century woman – even a foreigner – would be a well-respected, university educated, wait for it, FORENSIC PATHOLOGIST is SO out their (at least in my ignorant of the period opinion) as to invalidate the whole novel moving it from the historical crime section into the fantasy section. Not only was Adelia a working breathing anachronism in that regard – if that wasn’t bad enough – but she was highly sceptical of all religion (having a working knowledge of Christianity, Judaism and Islam), a Socialist (or at least highly critical of the existing social structure) and a Feminist. In other words she was an early 21st century woman transported to the late 12th century without any apparent conflict or discontinuity. What makes the whole thing worse for me though was that this was a bloody good novel. Characterisation was good down to the level of very secondary characters who had believable backstories and reasonable motivations for their actions, the setting was very well done and was easily visualised throughout, and the pace was good and never lagged or raced ahead of the narrative. It was, in essence, very well constructed and equally well executed. I honestly really enjoyed it – despite the GLARING anachronism at its very heart. If it had taken place in the 20th century I would have heaped nothing but praise on this book. However, I just can’t get over the central character being so out of place. If, in later novels, it turns out that Adelia is an amnesic time-traveller that would make PERFECT sense and would make me very happy. Recommended – kind of!   

7 comments:

Sarah @ All The Book Blog Names Are Taken said...

No. No. No no no no no no. NO. :)

Rumors of Eleanor poisoning Rosemund didn't even start at the time of her death, but the legend grew many years later, along with the maze and silk thread and all that. Trashing Eleanor's reputation became popular long after she was gone too, when later chroniclers took things out of context and made everything far more gossipy then it actually was.

The review is great though, and I agree that if it is revealed that the main character is a time traveler it would make this story much better. I can't not abide such flgrant historical inaccuracies.

mudpuddle said...

i hear Sarah... as you both indicated: a time travel fantasy...

CyberKitten said...

@ Sarah: Oh, I KNEW that would be your reaction to this. I shuddered all the way through in anticipation of what you'd be thinking of it.

@ Mudpuddle: It'd SO work on that level!

Judy Krueger said...

I have not read this author though I know the name. Good to know she can write well. As for the reality she proposes, I wonder why an author would do that or not be aware of her inaccuracies. Just having fun? Money? Bad research? It boggles the mind.

CyberKitten said...

@Judy: I don't understand why she chose the 12th century as a place to locate such a modern character. It'd be FAR more believable in even the 19th century with still enough sexism to go around.

Sarah @ All The Book Blog Names Are Taken said...

I would not have been able to read this, I'd have thrown it out the window. I am glad you read it, so I don't have to!

CyberKitten said...

All part of my role/service Sarah! Although I do *try* to keep the total of bad books (not that this was one fundamentally) to an absolute minimum. Even my impulse buys are pretty good after so much experience buying books.