Just Finished Reading: The Indian Mutiny 1857 by Saul David (FP: 2002) [382pp]
It had been simmering for some time if anyone had being paying attention enough to notice. The conditions of the local troops hadn’t really improved for years and it showed. But most of the British Army officers and those of the East India Company throughout central India had other concerns than the native forces under their control. The spark, when it happened, could have been foreseen. In part at least simply a case of a process not thought through and in part the result of poor or absent communication what could have been a smooth transition to an updated rifle cartridge was enough to cause dismay, confusion and, with the help of agitators, ultimately mutiny. As rumours quickly spread through Indian units that the new cartridges had been tainted with pig or cow fat – thereby offending both Hindu and Muslim soldiers – British officers struggled to contain the growing disquiet. When ‘suspect’ units were disarmed and returned to barracks – often at gunpoint – the mere rumour of this happening to others finally brought things into the open. Whole units rose up and killed their British officers as well as anyone suspected of supporting them. Then they turned on the local population, killing foreigners and Christian converts – men, women and children. As the revolt grew so did the panic in the European communities across central India. Some senior officers tried to take control and talk their men back to barracks. Most tried and died. Some fled to higher command or barricaded themselves and local Europeans in any structure considered secure enough to hold out until relieved. Some, as at Lucknow, managed to hold out. Others, as at Cawnpore, ended in surrender and, ultimately, massacre. When the British response came it was crushing and brutal. Stories of massacre and the ‘dishonouring’ of women circulated within the army units as they marched north to relieve garrisons and extract revenge. The stories of widespread rape turned out to be unfounded but the wholesale killing by rebel forces was anything but. The British were by this time in no mood to engage in gentlemanly warfare and executed any local official suspected of helping or aiding the mutiny and, once battle was given, took very few prisoners. It was a very bloody affair indeed with no quarter asked and very little given. Of course when it was all over – months later – the subsequent enquiry revealed that the whole sorry incident could have been avoided if more attention had been given to native soldiers and reforms both in the army and government at all levels been undertaken. Much of this did indeed follow the end of the Mutiny but could have been instituted without the resultant bloodshed. But one important thing, at least from the British perspective, did follow the Mutiny: the East India Company lost its mandate to administer large parts of India and the British government took over. The Raj, the jewel in the Imperial crown, was about to be born.
7 comments:
great post~ i'd look for this book except for the caveat... even if they're all crazy, humans ought at least to be educated in basic physics and astronomy at an early age; and not religion! which is non-education anyway...
I'd heard of this, but never experienced any of the details until reading that novel last year set during the mutiny -- part of the Jack Lark series by Paul Collard. Grisly stuff, and from your description here it sounds accurate.
@ Mudpuddle: I hink at least some of the reason for the Mutiny was religious - although largely inflamed by fake news and manipulated rumour. Most of it was political though in a last ditch attempt to throw off the expected total British domination of the sub-continent and loss of local power structures.
@ Stephen: It was indeed grisly stuff. The massacre following the surrender of Cawnpore was particularly nasty when the European survivors thought they were being released, were put in boats and then fired upon from all sides. Very few actually survived.
I have read a couple fictional accounts of the mutiny but not any nonfiction.
@ Judy: Interesting... What were they? I only know of Stephen's book and one another by Julian Rathbone. I expect that there are many more out there though being such a dramatic time.
The one I remember best is Shadow of the Moon by M M Kaye.
Oooh, interesting! I'd never heard of her until I saw she wrote 'The Far Pavilions'. Added to my 'interest' list. Thanks!
Post a Comment