About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Thursday, March 27, 2025


Just Finished Reading: To Win a War – 1918 The Year of Victory by John Terraine (FP: 1978) [259pp] 

1917 was a hard year for the Allied Powers. Not only had their offensives failed to achieve victory, but their attempts had almost destroyed their army's ability to fight. The French front-line commands had been wracked with mutiny and some of their politicians were calling for peace at *any* price. The British meanwhile where struggling to fill their basic manpower needs and where being forced to downsize the units in France. What made things worse was that Russia had dropped out of the war with the inevitable influx of German units moving west for a renewed offensive.  

Despite prior knowledge, and a limited amount of preparation, the Allies where still taken by surprise when the hammer fell in the spring of 1918. Despite warnings the Allies still packed their front trenches with men and whole units were destroyed by massive artillery bombardments. Once overrun and with the survivors in headlong retreat, the German infantry poured through the gaps and moved deep into France. But, despite their numbers, despite their planning and despite new tactics (including elite Stormtrooper units) the Allied Front was never breached. Broken sure, bent out of shape certainly, but after weeks of attacks and thousands of casualties the line held. Completely exhausted, low on supplies and distracted by the opportunity of looting Allied supplies abandoned in haste, the German assault ground to a halt. Hit first by outbreaks of Spanish Flu they were hit time and time again by the French, British and increasingly by American counter attacks. Slowly withdrawal became retreat and retreat become a general fallback from ground bloodily taken and retaken over the past four years. The 100 days of defeat had begun, and the end of the Great War was finally in sight. 

After reading about the German spring offensive (or rather offensives) of 1918 I was reasonably familiar with the events discussed in the first half of this book. What I was much less familiar with, and which I found very interesting, was the political manoeuvring behind the scenes to end the war and why, for instance, the Allies seemed to be satisfied by an Armistice rather than the full and unconditional surrender they demanded in 1945. Despite planning for campaign in 1919 (and indeed with some thinking that the war would still be raging in 1920!) both the British and most especially the French were spent, or close to being so, in the latter half of 1918. It was just conceivable that the final push could take place in 1919 but any continuation of the war beyond the spring of that year was unthinkable even with the growing manpower of the US Army. 

Despite having some notable axes to grind – the author *really* didn’t like the UK PM David Lloyd George! – this was an interesting and informative read. Getting some insights into the thinking of the Allied and German commanders certainly added to my understanding of why the war took so long to end even after it was obvious to just about everyone that Germany had lost the fight. Recommended if you can source a copy. More up to date works on this important period to come. 

2 comments:

Stephen said...

I've read (American) newspapers from 1918 and they really believed the spring offensive could be a war-ender in the wrong way. Kinda wish the US had stayed out of it. An even peace between France and Germany would have been better in the long run than the vindictive one France wanted and Wilson enabled. Unfortunately that's more or less a "hindsight is 20/20" observation.

CyberKitten said...

There was *real* panic at the time of the German spring offensive. But looking back it was unlikely to be as effective as they needed it to be. The Allies at that time were more than able to stop it once they got their collective resources together. Remember the German advance was at *walking* pace so the Allies had plenty of time to react - and had effective air superiority (and all too often supremacy) PLUS they had *hundreds* of pretty decent tanks at that point.

The British repeatedly told the French that they were being too vindictive (although its understandable in the circumstances). A handful of the major players said at the time that they were only stocking up trouble for the future... Even some FRENCH leaders said (after Versailles) that it wasn't peace but a 20 year armistice! How RIGHT they were....