Why Doesn't America Believe in Evolution?
By Jeff Hecht for New Scientist
Sunday 20 August 2006
Human beings, as we know them, developed from earlier species of animals: true or false? This simple question is splitting America apart, with a growing proportion thinking that we did not descend from an ancestral ape. A survey of 32 European countries, the US and Japan has revealed that only Turkey is less willing than the US to accept evolution as fact. Religious fundamentalism, bitter partisan politics and poor science education have all contributed to this denial of evolution in the US, says Jon Miller of Michigan State University in East Lansing, who conducted the survey with his colleagues. "The US is the only country in which [the teaching of evolution] has been politicised," he says. "Republicans have clearly adopted this as one of their wedge issues. In most of the world, this is a non-issue."
Miller's report makes for grim reading for adherents of evolutionary theory. Even though the average American has more years of education than when Miller began his surveys 20 years ago, the percentage of people in the country who accept the idea of evolution has declined from 45 in 1985 to 40 in 2005 (Science, vol 313, p 765). That's despite a series of widely publicised advances in genetics, including genetic sequencing, which shows strong overlap of the human genome with those of chimpanzees and mice. "We don't seem to be going in the right direction," Miller says. There is some cause for hope. Team member Eugenie Scott of the National Center for Science Education in Oakland, California, finds solace in the finding that the percentage of adults overtly rejecting evolution has dropped from 48 to 39 in the same time. Meanwhile the fraction of Americans unsure about evolution has soared, from 7 per cent in 1985 to 21 per cent last year. "That is a group of people that can be reached," says Scott.
The main opposition to evolution comes from fundamentalist Christians, who are much more abundant in the US than in Europe. While Catholics, European Protestants and so-called mainstream US Protestants consider the biblical account of creation as a metaphor, fundamentalists take the Bible literally, leading them to believe that the Earth and humans were created only 6000 years ago. Ironically, the separation of church and state laid down in the US constitution contributes to the tension. In Catholic schools, both evolution and the strict biblical version of human beginnings can be taught. A court ban on teaching creationism in public schools, however, means pupils can only be taught evolution, which angers fundamentalists, and triggers local battles over evolution.
These battles can take place because the US lacks a national curriculum of the sort common in European countries. However, the Bush administration's No Child Left Behind act is instituting standards for science teaching, and the battles of what they should be has now spread to the state level. Miller thinks more genetics should be on the syllabus to reinforce the idea of evolution. American adults may be harder to reach: nearly two-thirds don't agree that more than half of human genes are common to chimpanzees. How would these people respond when told that humans and chimps share 99 per cent of their genes?
6 comments:
"nearly two-thirds don't agree that more than half of human genes are common to chimpanzees"
see, that's what I don't understand about these people. How can they "not agree" with a fact? I get it if they say I don't believe that 99% DNA the same means we are descended from apes, but I don't understand how they can just turn round and say it's not true that we share 99% of our DNA. There are so few definitive facts in science, as creationists are so keen to point out (it's all just a theory you know), and they are happy enough to present their own flimsy psuedoscience absolute fact, but won't accept genetics!
grrrr! That's why i only bother arguing with the ones that at least try to look at the science. whats the point of debating sensibly if the other person is just going to say "actually i don't agree that anything about you/your world is true - God did everything the way I say!"
I am tolerant of a lot of viewpoints, religions, whatever. But if someone believes the world is 6000 years old, using the term moron to describe that person would be an insult to morons.
It's not just a simple difference of opinion. It is one side of the argument walking through life in a bubble completely ignoring every single bit of information that their eyes see every moment of the day.
Indeed. I don't mind if people are ignorant of the facts.. after all you can't know everything.. what really grinds my gears is *wilful* ignorance.. the refusal to know stuff because it might upset the apple cart of your belief system. Gets me every time...
The only way you can deny the actual age of the Earth/Universe is to go off into some kind of fantasy world where things only seem to be real... but are *in point of fact* manufactured to look that way... but they're not fooled because they believe the stories in an old book... go figure!
You know, they never really landed on the moon. It was faked in a Hollywood back lot. :-)
Dback: Actually, I don't care if someone believes the earth is 6,000 years old. That's their bag - but the problem comes in when their beliefs start crafting public policy and educational goals for everyone. Keep that shit in Sunday School - it's not science.
"How would these people respond when told that humans and chimps share 99 per cent of their genes?" They would claim it's junk science being forced down their throats by the radical left who control the media, public education, and the courts and is a threat to their way of life. :-) At least that's what I hear on conservative talk radio. Yes, I'm spying on the other side. *snigger*
Post a Comment