About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

No religion and an end to war: how thinkers see the future

By Alok Jha for The Guardian

January 1, 2007

People's fascination for religion and superstition will disappear within a few decades as television and the internet make it easier to get information, and scientists get closer to discovering a final theory of everything, leading thinkers argue today. The web magazine Edge (www.edge.org) asked more than 150 scientists and intellectuals: "What are you optimistic about?" Answers included hope for an extended human life span, a bright future for autistic children, and an end to violent conflicts around the world.

Philosopher Daniel Denett believes that within 25 years religion will command little of the awe it seems to instil today. The spread of information through the internet and mobile phones will "gently, irresistibly, undermine the mindsets requisite for religious fanaticism and intolerance".

Biologist Richard Dawkins said that physicists would give religion another problem: a theory of everything that would complete Albert Einstein's dream of unifying the fundamental laws of physics. "This final scientific enlightenment will deal an overdue death blow to religion and other juvenile superstitions." Part of that final theory will be formulated by scientists working on the Large Hadron Collider, a particle accelerator at Cern in Geneva, which is to be switched on this year. It will smash protons together to help scientists understand what makes up the most fundamental bits of the universe.

Steven Pinker, a psychologist at Harvard University, highlighted the decline of violence: "Most people, sickened by the bloody history of the 20th century, find this claim incredible. Yet, as far as I know, every systematic attempt to document the prevalence of violence over centuries and millennia (and, for that matter, the past 50 years), particularly in the west, has shown the overall trend is downward."

John Horgan, of the Stevens Institute of Technology, New Jersey, was optimistic "that one day war - large-scale, organised group violence - will end once and for all".

This will also be the year that we get to grips with our genomes. George Church, a geneticist at Harvard Medical School, believes we will learn "so much more about ourselves and how we interact with our environment and fellow humans".

Simon Baron-Cohen, a psychologist at Cambridge University, focused on autistic children, saying their outlook had never been better. "There is a remarkably good fit between the autistic mind and the digital age," he said. "Many develop an intuitive understanding of computers, in the same way other children develop an intuitive understanding of people."

Leo Chalupa, a neurobiologist at the University of California, Davis, predicted that, by the middle of this century, it would not be uncommon for people to lead active lives well beyond the age of 100. He added: "We will be able to regenerate parts of the brain that have been worn out. So better start thinking what you'll be doing with all those extra years."

[Interesting – though I think some of the hopes and predictions are just a little too optimistic, especially Daniel Denett’s prediction of the ‘end of religion’ in 25 years…. It could possibly happen in 250 years with a concerted global effort but I think that rather unlikely, don’t you?]

7 comments:

Juggling Mother said...

I don't believe my kids will live in such a perfect world. 25 years is just ridiculous for whole concepts to die out, let alone one so wide ranging & influential as religion!

I am optimistic it will be a better world though.

CyberKitten said...

Some things will indeed be better, some will be worse & lots will stay the same.

Any major change will take generations. The idea that religion or war will fade into history in 25 years is, as you say, ridiculous. I find it hard to believe that someone as "bright" as Mr Dennett could've said such a thing.

Skywolf said...

Yep, it sounds pretty unlikely to me as well. The thing is, the people who are most under the thumb of religion (ie fundamentalists, for the most part) won't even consider examining greater possibilities or expanding their minds to encompass scientific breakthroughs. If they're incapable of doing that now, why would they suddenly start just because information is more available?

And while I heartily support the notion of ending 'religious fanaticism and intolerance', I'm not altogether sure that a world without belief of any kind would be a better one. I don't necessarily accept the possibility that there's nothing science can't uncover, nor do I believe it's even close to uncovering everything yet. There are still things we simply can't explain in the world. Giving them credence isn't necessarily submmitting to 'juvenile superstitions'. Perhaps one day we will come up with the science necessary to explain the things we can't now, but dismissing something simply because science doesn't yet back it up is often foolish and closed-minded, I think.

But that works both ways, and the religious fanatics who dismiss something simply because their religion doesn't back it up are just as, if not more, foolish and closed-minded. I really do believe there has to be a balance.

And thanks for your comment. :)

CyberKitten said...

Hey, skywolf. Thanks for your insight. I hope you pop in from time to time - and good luck again. I know how hard it is to get into the University you want - been there, done that.. came out the otherside with a degree...

Skywolf said...

I will definitely be popping in. Hope you'll do the same! And thanks for the well-wishes. It's a bit of a bugger at the moment, but I'm sure I'll get there eventually. All is not yet lost...

Ken Comer said...

I believe that "religiosity" is heritable. I think the only way we will finally get rid of it is genetic engineering...And I am not sure about the ethics of programming thought by genetic modification.

CyberKitten said...

KC said: I believe that "religiosity" is heritable.

That's a possibilty that could go some way to explain why religion has such an apparent hold over the majority of mankind. Does that mean though that atheism also is an inherited characteristic or do atheists just have the 'God' gene missing?

Its quite possible that we are 'programmed' to believe in 'something' - but what that thing is depends on our culture. Change the culture and you change the belief system...?

Maybe.....