About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Saturday, August 26, 2017


'Self-driving' lorries to be tested on UK roads

From The BBC

25 August 2017

Small convoys of partially self-driving lorries will be tried out on major British roads by the end of next year, the government has announced. A contract has been awarded to the Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) to carry out the tests of vehicle "platoons". Up to three lorries will travel in formation, with acceleration and braking controlled by the lead vehicle. But the head of the AA said platoons raised safety concerns. In the platoons, the lead vehicle will be controlled by a human driver and will communicate with the rest of the convoy wirelessly. The following vehicles will be instructed to accelerate and brake by the lead vehicle, allowing the lorries to drive closer together than they could with human drivers.

Lorries driving close together could reduce air resistance for the following vehicles, as the front lorry pushes air out of the way. This could lead to fuel efficiency savings for haulage companies, which Transport Minister Paul Maynard hopes will be passed on to consumers. The following vehicles could also react more quickly to the lead lorry braking than human drivers can. However, human drivers will still steer all the lorries in the convoy. The TRL will begin trials of the technology on test tracks, but these trials are expected to move to major roads by the end of 2018. The government has been promising such a project since at least 2014. Last year, for example, it announced its intention to carry out platooning trials but was later frustrated after some European lorrymakers declined to participate. A Department for Transport spokesman told the BBC that the experiments are now expected to go ahead as the contract had been awarded.

Platooning has been tested in a number of countries around the world, including the US, Germany and Japan. However, British roads present a unique challenge, said Edmund King, president of the AA. "We all want to promote fuel efficiency and reduce congestion but we are not yet convinced that lorry platooning on UK motorways is the way to go about it," he said, pointing out, for example, that small convoys of lorries can block road signs from the view of other road users. "We have some of the busiest motorways in Europe with many more exits and entries. Platooning may work on the miles of deserted freeways in Arizona or Nevada but this is not America," he added. His comments were echoed by the RAC Foundation. Its director, Steve Gooding, said: "Streams of close-running HGVs could provide financial savings on long-distance journeys, but on our heavily congested motorways - with stop-start traffic and vehicles jostling for position - the benefits are less certain." Campaign group the Road Haulage Association said "safety has to come first". Transport Minister Paul Maynard said platooning could lead to cheaper fuel bills, lower emissions and less congestion. "But first we must make sure the technology is safe and works well on our roads, and that's why we are investing in these trials," he said.

[It’s been a long time coming but anyone who has been keeping an eye on tech progress it’s inevitable that fully autonomous vehicles will be the end point of baby steps such as this. I’d say that within 20 years (a conservative estimate) that 50% of all haulage and delivery vehicles will be self-drive and that within 30 years all public transport plus rail transport will be fully autonomous. It is, as they say, only a matter of time. Any organisation that tries to flow against the tide will not be able to compete against robotic vehicles that can drive faster, safer and for longer than any human being. Once they become accepted people will really wonder why we took so long to have them on our roads. Welcome to the future of transport.]

7 comments:

Fred said...

Obviously, I'm more doubtful than you about safety issues.

CyberKitten said...

..and the legal issues if something goes wrong. If a self-drive vehicle causes a crash... who exactly is responsible?

If the tech is good enough and the software sound enough (and secure enough!) I expect driverless cars to have a MUCH better safety record than that of people driven ones.

Mudpuddle said...

MY LORD, what hath G wrought? i'm an old curmudgeon, but i can't see anything but disaster resulting from this tech... i'd stay away from the freeways... forever....

CyberKitten said...

lol - I imagine they'll only get a licence once its considered safe - plus for at least a while there will be a human driver along as a passenger 'just in case' measure before they go fully autonomous.

Fred said...

When they do turn these things loose on the highway, I hope they have large signs warning other drivers that a computer (gigo) is in charge. I know if I saw one, I would give it lots of room, a mile or two ahead or behind.

Of course, we all know that computers are infallible.

CyberKitten said...

People definitely trust computers far too much. If something is presented on a screen - especially as a chart - it must be true. If only more people lived by the GIGO model!

As anyone who regularly uses a computer knows they can be unreliable and occasionally inexplicable when working 'normally'. Never mind when they are actually faulty or compromised.

Fred said...

A lot of "ifs" there.