About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Monday, November 08, 2010

Thinking About: The Age of Austerity



I have lost count of the number of times the phrase ‘Age of Austerity’ has been mentioned by politicians and commentators recently. It’s as if they have all received the same script in the post and are simply reading from it. It has become the default phrase to describe the mess we’re in. Of course the ironic bit is that the people who caused this present financial fiasco will feel little or any of its effects. Bonuses are back in style. Some of the very people who are responsible for the world-wide banking failures will be getting a bonus this year which exceeds what many of my readership receive in their salaries over 20 years. Of course, we are told rather patronisingly, we have to pay them their huge salaries, bonuses and perks because they, the noble few, will pull us out of the recession they created with their ingrained entrepreneurial spirit – bless them! Where as we, at the bottom of any particular totem pole, are told to get on with consuming (or saving or both) to provide the cash that they will use, for the good of us all, to build a better world. Of course their will be a modicum of pain in the process of getting to this economic Promised Land. There will be unemployment, spending cuts, hardship and despair but, as we are regularly told on TV, we’re all in this together – though it appears that some are more in it (the shit that is) than others who drive past it in their limousines.


Presently it appears that those within the Anglo-American axis are taking it lying down. Not so our Continental friends who are protesting, rioting and burning cars in the streets. You have to admire the French (in particular) and the Greeks. They certainly know how the throw a riot – and the odd petrol bomb. You can’t say that they’re taking events lightly. No, sir! They are not following the orders of their betters and falling on their collective swords in the name of economic solidarity. They have singularly failed to grasp that for the rich and shameless to maintain their necessary lifestyles that some (OK quite a lot) of peasants must fall by the wayside. It is the way of things after all. For the rich to stay rich, or if possible get richer, the poor must stay poor and do what they’re bloody well told to do. We Brits have been know to go for the odd riot ourselves, but the most famous tend to be way back in our history – the Tolpuddle Martyrs (1834), the Peterloo Massacre (1819) as well as the much more contemporary Poll-Tax riot (1990). Until fairly recently we would have written a strongly worded letter to the Times or our MP. These days we are more likely to whinge about things to our neighbours – if we talk to them – or in the pub over copious pints of cheap watery beer.


In many ways I am in a rather privileged position. My job is fairly safe for the next 2 years or so until the project I’m working on finishes. I own my own house which is presently ‘worth’ much more than I paid for it. I have money in the bank and could, if things took a decided turn for the worst, probably live on my savings – yes, I’m one of those strange people who saves money at the end of each month – for 6 months without getting into debt with the banks. Things should be much better by the time I could be looking for another job. The cycle of boom and bust moves ever onwards. Of course it should be back to the ‘bustier’ side of things when I’m coming up to retirement in 10 years or so. Knowing the likelihood of that it might be a good investment – whilst I actually have money – to start buying gold and burying it in my garden. It’s the prudent thing to do in these uncertain and austere times.

8 comments:

VV said...

The vast majority of the American people are passive sheep, trained to take it up the backside and ask for more. The other portion of our population are easily manipulated into thinking what's wrong is somebody else's fault and will revolt at the drop of a hat, even if they don't understand what they should be revolting about, or who's to blame.

CyberKitten said...

Mostly sheep here. Thankfully we don't have anything like those tea-party people..... [shudder]

Stephen said...

"Age of Austerity" must be a favorite for the British media: Billy Bragg referenced it in one of his songs, "Between the Wars".

(I raised a family / in times of austerity / with sweat at the foundry / between the wars)

dbackdad said...

We are indeed "passive sheep" or just sheep in general. It's the "what's the matter with kansas" syndrome where people will vote against their economic self-interest because they get distracted by shiny things like gay-marriage and abortion. This year it's "socialism" and "obamacare".

Thomas Fummo said...

Completely agree with you.
There have been planty of protests and riots back home in Italy, regarding job cuts, pay cuts, hazardous waste dumps...

One thing I've also noticed is that as long as nobody says anything, the state is friendly and encouraging, with it's speeches of 'being with the people' and, like you mentioned, that 'we're all in this together'.

But see one person shout, one peaceful march, one flag or one raised fist... and the riot police descend with the compassion and care of a sledgehammer.

Luckily that never happens in Britain. Thank goodness for discount happy hours and effing Strictly Come Dancing.

wstachour said...

Yeah. What dbackdad said.

I get why the rich--who are not coincidentally also the powerful--wish their privileged position extended and protected, but I have such trouble accepting that they get so many in the working classes to argue their case for them. It is indeed the "What's the matter with Kansas" syndrome which Thomas Frank outlined so well.

VV said...

Hey, thanks guys. I'd never heard of Frank's book, even though I'm familiar with the political problem of voting against one's own interests. Just read up on Frank and his book. It sounds like something I should read.

CyberKitten said...

sc said: "Age of Austerity" must be a favorite for the British media

I think the journalist are harking back to the 1970's and the editors to the 1950's....

dbackdad said: It's the "what's the matter with kansas" syndrome where people will vote against their economic self-interest

I've been amazed by interviews with poor people who are very pro-tax cuts for the rich... as if it will help them directly (or even indirectly!)

TF said: Thank goodness for discount happy hours and effing Strictly Come Dancing.

Bread & Circuses.... except that the bread is just too damned expensive... and you *really* shouldn't get me started on so-called popular TV [grin]

wunelle said: I have such trouble accepting that they get so many in the working classes to argue their case for them.

I too find it completely inexplicable.