Just Finished Reading: The Second Sleep by Robert Harris
(FP: 2019) [414pp]
It is the Year of Our Risen Lord 1468 and young priest
Christopher Fairfax is both late and lost. He has been tasked to officiate at a
fellow priest’s funeral and wonders if the tasking from his bishop is a test of
future progress in Mother Church. Arriving at his destination late at night he
is forced to go through his deceased colleagues effects to learn something
about him to make any eulogy more personal. It is then that he stumbles on
Heresy. Not only has the dead man been collecting banned books but he has
clearly been accumulating forbidden objects long since made anathema by the
Church to prevent its flock wandering away from the path into older evil ways.
Most shocking of all is an object, beautiful in its own inexplicable way, with
the very mark of the beast clearly visible on its back – an apple with a single
bite removed, the very manifestation of Eve’s act of defiance to God in the
Garden of Eden. But where did these objects come from and why did a priest keep
them? Forced to stay in the village longer than expected Fairfax becomes
entangled in a local search for buried treasure, the allure of a local once
rich widow and the machinations of the local business magnate. As revelation
after revelation about the long dead past come to light can Fairfax keep his
already shaky faith in tact or will his superiors keep such revelations buried
for good?
WARNING: SPOILERS AHEAD!
I was already aware that this wasn’t a straight forward ‘Medieval’
tale before I started it. This became fairly obvious when a parakeet flew over
the main character within a few pages of the start. Funnily a critic in (I
think) the NYT proposed that any previous civilization collapse must have been from
Climate change based on this slim evidence. What she didn’t realise was that
parakeets are common in the South East of England today… Anyway, the ‘reveal’
that this was in fact the future rather than the past – complete with iPhone! -
comes on page 28-29 so I’m not really giving much away here. Once that is
accepted the story moves on at a good pace and is intriguingly full of speculation
about what happened (about 800 years previously) to cause the collapse of ‘Elizabethan’
civilisation. One of the characters – an antiquarian – we meet later speculates
on several theories but seems to zero in on one of them, a sudden and catastrophic
collapse of all advanced technology. There is a hint (I think) about what is
called a Carrington Event which is essentially a HUGE EMP surge from the Sun
which, theoretically at least, could take out satellites and lots of stuff on
the surface too.
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBxjwzKwVl0] - For more details.
If a big one
happened it could be pretty nasty – at least in the short term. What made it
worse, according to the narrative, was humanities total obsession with and
dependence on mobile electronic devices. No iPhone, no Civilisation. QED. So,
yet again, within days of the ‘Event’ people left the cities, fled into the
countryside and died in droves. It looked like an 80-90% die-off. Following
around 100 years of Anarchy (and not in a good way) civilisation got its act
back together by coalescing around churches which allowed the Church to take
back its place as top dog and subsequently stay in control of just about
everything. Sounds reasonable, right?
OK. First I have to say that I have a lot of time for this
author. Not only had he produced some good work that I have enjoyed greatly he
honestly writes really well – including throughout this equally well written
novel. But I think this is another example of a non-SF writer trying his hand
at SF (soft SF though it is). I can see what probably prompted it – one encounter
too many with an iPhone zombie, someone lost using GPS or yet another Internet
Troll. I get it. People like that exist and would be at a loss if the ‘Net went
down for more than 10 minutes. BUT even if ALL advanced technology suddenly
went offline it would NOT result in the collapse of human civilisation. Even if
a super-Carrington Event took out all of our satellites and all of our phone
networks and much else besides we could still get back up and running, at least
making do at a minimal level, within a few weeks at worst (we’d fix the
satellites later. We can do without them for now). Sure by then a lot of people
would’ve probably died, maybe into the hundreds of thousands, but a minimal
system for command and control would be back soon enough to prevent a TOTAL
collapse. Within 6 months we’d have the backbone back online and the Internet
would be back too. After that maybe we’d be back fully up and running within
12-18 months. The expertise is there and the will would be there. It’s just a
matter of time, resources and knowhow.
So, the Church taking power again. The church in England (or
indeed the Church of England) is presently holding onto its very existence by
its fingernails. I’ve seen projections that at its present rate of decline it
will cease to exist in less than 5 generations. Mainland Europe is in a similar
situation with some countries practically religion free. So the idea that the
Church could take and hold power, or that large swathes of the population would
turn to Mother Church to explain what just happened or to organise a New Order
is frankly farcical. The idea of the Church holding on to power for 800 years in
any stable form is even more farcical. What really takes the biscuit (or
cookie) is the idea that the Church can control or supress knowledge or
technology for that (indeed any) length of time. First the author mentioned a
King of England. If there is a secular as well as a church authority there
will, inevitably, be conflict between them. My bet is on the secular side. Then
there was mention of two wars – the recent war with France (rather inevitably!)
and the war with the ‘Northern Caliphate’ which I found borderline racist to be
honest. Now, in any kind of warfare – especially if it’s potentially existential
– you’re going to be looking for any advantage in its prosecution. That usually
means technological advantage. If France or the ‘Caliphate’ had a less
controlling church or were willing (with God’s permission naturally) to use old
tech then they’d have a distinct advantage and probably win – therefore the
Churches grip on knowledge/technology would inevitably weaken over time and the
secular powers would increase in power. So a long term domination by the Church
in any kind of competitive power environment is, at least, unlikely if not
impossible. Lastly there is the economic problem. Clearly in the book the technology,
knowledge and economy is generally what we’d view as Medieval or at least
pre-industrial. One of the characters, Captain Hancock, is an industrialist
looking, as always, for any advantage over his rivals. He is quite willing to
use old tech to do this even if it means deceiving the Church to do so. Again,
over the long haul, economic competition between countries or regions with ANY
difference in adherence to Church directives will ensure that old techniques,
old knowledge and old ways will be used to maintain or increase wealth and
power. Money talks even when it is against the teachings of the Church. So,
Church power? Not a chance.
OK, rant almost over. By FAR the biggest problem
I had with this otherwise pretty good book (despite everything I’ve said above)
was the ending – that is the absolutely ABRUPT ending. A fair part of the book
revolved around the discovery and literal unearthing or buried ‘treasure’
presumed to be a cache of ‘something’ designed by those aware that everything
COULD fall apart to start the process of bringing it all back. The last part of
the book sidles up to this cache and then….. STOPS. The only two reasons I can
think of (apart from the idea that the author merely wanted his readers to ‘speculate’
on what was through the door) is that the author didn’t KNOW what was through
the door – I did, it was a LIBRARY – or simply didn’t want to enter the room
(into the library) because that would’ve started the rebuilding of a society I
was getting the impression he wasn’t particularly impressed with. Needless to
say I was DEEPLY unimpressed by the last page. So, despite this being a (generally)
well written and (mostly) interesting work I honestly can’t recommend it unless
you really want to see why the whole thing frustrated me SO much. Rant over,
and I didn’t even get to criticising the pointless relationship bit!