Just Finished Reading :
The Crusades – A Very Short Introduction by Christopher Tyerman
Yes, yet another VSI book and the 2nd of 5 leant to me by my
good friend CQ. Also yet again it’s an area that I know something about and
have some interest in. Needless to say I know a lot more about them and my
interest has increased also thanks to a very well written account of events
spanning several hundred years of Medieval European ‘foreign policy’. As you
probably already know the main focus of the Crusades was to restore the Holy Land to Christian dominion after its fall to the
forces of Turkish and Arab origin. By and large these where spectacular and
frankly embarrassing failures. Other crusades were focused inside Europe
notably against the Cathars in France
resulting in bloody massacres in the largely successful attempt to crush a
dangerous heresy that could very well have overthrown the Catholic Church.
Of course this is all very interesting – if rather brutal
and pointless seen from our 21st Century perspective – but what I
enjoyed most about this slim volume (and I intend following up in other works
by this author) is the often complex and less than obvious motivations for
Crusading. Seen at face value the Crusades were attempts by the Catholic Church
to both expand and defend Christendom. This, the author contends, is all too
simplistic and fails to address the underlying political and economic drivers
as well as the human factors involved. At heart the Crusades were about power.
The Catholic Church, under attack from home and abroad, needed to assert its
authority in the strongest way possible – at sword point. The defenders of the
faith who went out the fight and die under the cross aided the institutions of
Christianity rather than the beliefs themselves. Scripture was twisted to give
authority to the soldiers in the field to be soldiers for God and to kill in
his name. Kings and Princes were seduced, bribed and all too often threatened
to ensure their compliance in the wars for Holy Mother Church - largely to
stamp the authority of Rome (and for a period Avignon) on the growing temporal
powers. Only with the rise of the nation-state with national self interests and
later with the Great Schism did this authority wane and the Crusades fade into
memory. Nations were no longer so eager to expend blood and gold on projects
not clearly in their own best interests.
4 comments:
Removing oneself from all the bloodshed, the Crusades are hilarious to me for their increasing short-sightedness. In the beginning, they marched across Europe and into the middle east to save the Holy Land from the infidel.
The next time, they got as far as Constantinople because really, what's the difference? Brown people, weird religion -- they could use some killin, right?
And then they were just going into southern Italy to take down personal foes of the popes. It's pathetic, really.
The Road to Hell is paved with good intentions...... [grin]
Generally the Crusades where badly organised, badly financed and badly fought - all pretty much to no good effect. If you want to know how not to run a military campaign these are shining examples. What I found amazing was the often blatant hypocrisy of the whole affair - though no doubt some of those involved actually believed that they were doing God's work.
Terry Jones' dvd on the crusades is WELL WORTH viewin'.
BTW: Avoid my blog, there's a LOT of truth there.
When I read about all the wars and all the stupid, hateful reasons they were fought for, I can't help but shudder with embarrassment for our species.
I think I remember seeing Terry Jones' Crusades, it was hilarious and featured Terry Gilliam's animations if I recall correctly. Yes, worth checking out :)
Post a Comment