Just Finished Reading:
Christine by Stephen King
Arnie Cunningham (played by Keith Gordon in the 1983 movie
adaptation) is one of those people who spend their life being picked on and
bullied. If it wasn’t for his football jock friend Dennis Guilder (John
Stockwell) he would have probably ended up dead in High School. But now Arnie
has a new friend who can help him through life in more ways than one. A friend
who whispers into his ear late at night, a friend who gives Arnie the strength
to stand up to bullies and when required kill them for him. Christine is no
ordinary friend as everyone who crosses Arnie Cunningham will eventually find
out. Christine is indeed a blood-red 1958 Plymouth Fury and she’s aptly named
because she’s got a lot of fury deep inside her and she only needs Arnie’s
focus to let it out. Before too long many people are wondering just what
happened to the spotty geek who crept through the shadows to avoid those intent
on his painful humiliation. Those who are still alive to wonder of course……..
I’ve never been what you would call a huge Stephen
King fan. I’ve generally enjoyed the (many) movie adaptations – particularly
Firestarter and Dreamcatcher – but have generally avoided his books. I’m just
not into horror or the idea of scaring myself on purpose. I really can’t see
the point (and avoid things like roller-coasters and bungee jumping for the
same reason). But, as this book has been sitting on my shelf for years –
probably decades – and I’m doing the whole movie-related theme thing how could
I actually avoid something so obvious. Of course like most of adaptations Hollywood use the idea of
the book without necessarily following the plot of the book. It’s certainly
been along time since I saw the movie (probably in the late 80’s or early 90’s)
but I’m pretty certain that it was significantly different than what I read
between these pages – and not in a good way. As you might expect the book –
especially as it was just under 600 pages – went into a great deal more detail
than the movie ever could. Unfortunately for me King spent at least 100 and
probably more like 200 pages going over the same ground again and again. I
guess that he was building tension (of which there was some) but laboured
mightily to do so. King certainly got across a brooding menace inherent in the
character of Christine complete with outpourings of sudden and bloody violence
but, I thought, either undersold or oversold the effect. The movie had a
clearer, because of time and media constraints, idea of what Christine actually
was – inherently evil or possibly demon-possessed. The book went into great
detail about how is was the deep hate of the world and everything in it
embodied in her previous owner (prior to Arnie) who was, in effect, the
possessing spirit which to me didn’t make a whole lot of sense. Finally I found
the almost constant use of swearing (mainly F and quite a few C’s) to be
frankly wearing and unnecessary adding very little to the story. All-in-all I
was rather disappointed with the whole thing. It certainly hasn’t turned me on
(or back on) to Stephen King probably because it’s really just not my type of
literature. I know many people worship the ground he walks on, but I’m not one
of them.
5 comments:
I also don't like reading horror. I like suspense, but I draw the line at gore or demons. I therefore, have never read one of King's bigger books, but I did read a collection of his short stories and remember that they stuck with me and were disturbing. I wouldn't say I enjoyed them, because I don't like the genre, but I do think they were well written.
I've enjoyed some of King's works, his short story Survivor Type is one of my all time favorites. Yes, he can be a bit wordy at times, but I don't usually mind too much. I really enjoyed The Stand and The Talisman, which he co-wrote. Yes, the swearing does seem to be a bit excessive, and I have no problem with swearing.
I never read him, and like you I'm not a fan of horror in books of movies.
But this story, in film form, just did something for me. I watched it several times a few years back (to my wife's almost physically-damaging eye-rolling) and I can only surmised that it taps into this weird car thing I have. I don't think of my cars as intelligent entities, but I bond with them in a strange way, and this just takes the kernel of that out to an absurd degree.
But probably not enough to read the book!
Horror and fantasy only work for me when the stories have some...metaphysic cohesion, some interior set of rules that their universe makes sense by. It doesn't have to be the same as ours, but it needs to exist. I remember liking this one mostly because of the eerie way Christine seemed to exist in its own little time-bubble, but its backstory was never made sensible. 11/22/63 had the virtue of having rules that had to be obeyed, at least until the end when everything broke down rather abruptly.
sc said: 11/22/63 had the virtue of having rules that had to be obeyed, at least until the end when everything broke down rather abruptly.
I've thought about picking that up - being a fan of both time-travel and alt-history stories.... but I have *so* many other books to read I thought I'd give it a miss.
Post a Comment