Just Finished Reading:
The Captive Queen by Alison Weir
The small Kingdom
of France in the year
1151. Queen Eleanor, late of Aquitaine
is bored with her life in the North and with her less than attentive husband.
She dreams of having a passionate lover and returning to her beloved southern
homeland. Almost as if fated she meets Henry of Anjou, known as Henry
Plantagenet and start a torrid affair. Scheming to be together Eleanor
manufactures a divorce settlement with Louis of France and runs into the arms of
Henry to become his wife and with their marriage creating a vast empire which
expands further with Henry’s ascension to the English throne. But slowly,
despite their continued passion for each other, Eleanor’s grip on power begins
to recede as her husband reduces her role within what he regards as his domain.
Even producing a series of children that will continue the Empire into the
future – including two future Kings of England – fails to secure her position.
As battle lines are drawn – both literally and metaphorically – the whole of Europe holds its breath awaiting the start of a drawn out
and bloody civil war. Central to its outcome is the tempestuous relationship
between two of the towering characters of the age: Henry II and Queen Eleanor
of Aquitaine.
After reading two of her previous novels – Innocent
Traitor and The Lady Elizabeth – I was really looking forward to this one. I
hardly know anything about Eleanor or about that historical period so hoped to
get at least some insights into it before reading actual history books on the
topic. I was however more than a little disappointed. I had heard that Eleanor
was something special, a strong and forceful character that inspired women down
the ages. She certainly came across as a woman who knew her own mind and as
someone used to getting her own way even, which was still fairly unusual in
that time, ruling over men who had, apparently, the greatest respect for her.
Unfortunately she also came across as someone ruled by her passions and as
someone who was ultimately impotent against the power of her husband who
repeatedly overruled her, repeatedly impregnated her and for over a decade had
her imprisoned for daring to question his authority! This was, I couldn’t help
thinking, not exactly the feminist icon I was expecting. After reading about,
and being very much impressed with, both Lady Jane Grey and the Lady Elizabeth
(later Queen Elizabeth I) I’m afraid that Eleanor came across as a great
letdown as far as strong women go. What made it worse for me, and made this
novel somewhat of a slog, was that not a great deal happened to Eleanor. Much
of the action in her life too place, as it where, off camera and she only heard
about battles and deaths through letters delivered to her either at her own
court or later under house arrest. Many of the great characters of the age –
including her favourite son Richard who became know as Lionheart – came across
either as petulant teenagers or two dimensional actors in someone else’s play.
I honestly found most of this novel to be rather dull which came as somewhat of
a disappointing surprise after enjoying her previous works so much. Maybe I
simply looked forward to it too much or maybe I simply didn’t like Eleanor in
the same way that I admired Jane or Elizabeth. Whatever it was it seriously
diminished my enjoyment of this book.
3 comments:
When I started reading your description of this book, it sounded like a romance novel. I was surprised you would read romance. Then I continued reading and discovered the historical bent. I know so little about this time period and these events.
Have you seen the movie, "The Lion in Winter"? The dynamic between Eleanor and Henry was largely taken from it, according to the author's endnote
v v said: When I started reading your description of this book, it sounded like a romance novel. I was surprised you would read romance.
Not really my thing apart from things like Jane Austen [grin]. I have read a few though - mostly by accident. Not surprisingly I wasn't particularly impressed by them.
v v said: Then I continued reading and discovered the historical bent.
It was probably 80%+ relationship stuff with the historical stuff largely in the background. Her previous books had any relationship deeply embedded in the history which was far more interesting.
v v said: I know so little about this time period and these events.
Me neither. I'll rectify that at some point.
sc said: Have you seen the movie, "The Lion in Winter"? The dynamic between Eleanor and Henry was largely taken from it, according to the author's endnote.
A very long time ago. I think that there's a fair bit of evidence to support their 'passionate' relationship which apparently scandalised Christendom (after all they loved each other and made very public shows of affection!) What I didn't feel the need for was love scene after love scene. I got bored with that very quickly and found myself skimming bits of the book which is never a good sign!
Post a Comment