Just Finished Reading:
Heaven – A Traveller’s Guide to the Undiscovered Country by Peter Stanford
Not my normal reading I know, but I do like to throw a
little something different into the mix from time to time. After all the only
difference between a rut and a grave is its depth…..
Prompted by a personal tragedy the author, a lapsed Catholic
(IIRC), begins to ponder the question we all think about from time to time:
What happens when we die or more accurately after we die? One of the
possibilities is, of course, that we go to Heaven but what do we mean by
Heaven? Not surprisingly, as the whole idea is a human construct, ideas of what
Heaven is and even where it is have changed and evolved over time. As explorers
came back from exotic lands with exotic tales the worldly paradise moved
further and further away. Likewise as early astronomers explored the skies the
idea of Heaven up above moved inexorably further and further away. Heaven had
to become more spiritual and less physical as we gained deeper knowledge of the
world and the universe around us.
Tracing the idea in Christian, Muslim and other
religions the author lays out the cultural and historical evolution of Heaven
and embeds it in its context without which it is difficult if not impossible to
comprehend. It was an interesting and often fascinating ride full of surprising
little nuggets of knowledge which sometimes made me exclaim in surprise – for
example that early images of the divine had them wearing halo’s of different
shapes instead of the expected, and now uniform, circles. In the past,
depending on who you were, a halo could be square, triangular or a circle. It
was only later that the circle became ‘standardised’. That was most certainly
news to me! Overall this was an interesting and, at least to me, unusual read.
Written neither from a religious nor sceptical/atheistic perspective the author
neither hits you over the head with his piety whilst laughing at other beliefs
nor does he poke fun or roll his eyes at all religions with their foolish
ideas. Because of that I never turned off at any point nor could I see any
cause why a person of reasonable faith would do so. Recommended therefore for
both believers and non-believers alike.
2 comments:
Triangular halos? Reserved for mathematicians?
I can't remember who had one but I think it had something to do with the Trinity... so it might have been the Big G himself.....
Post a Comment