Just Finished Reading: Atheism – A Guide for the Perplexed
by Kerry Walters (FP: 2010)
Over the past year or so I have become increasingly bored
with the so-called God Debate (or should I call it the So-called Debate). I
have come to the conclusion that those arguing the point are merely stating
their own opinions and attempt to argue against the opinions held by the other ‘side’.
Neither group can offer the killer argument because there isn’t one. You can
neither prove nor disprove the existence of God – especially to the other side’s
satisfaction. Any debate about God him (or her) self is speculation of the idlest
sort. If God exists (which I firmly do not believe despite everything I’ve just
said) I sincerely doubt if we could know anything significant about him/her/it.
It would, I feel, be a bit like asking an ant crawling along a cable to speculate
about the attributes of the Internet as data pours along the fibres beneath its
feet. It’s about as pointless as it gets. What increasingly surprises and
saddens me is that some of the world’s greatest minds – and not just on the
side of the Atheists – spend a great deal of time, effort and energy debating
the subject when they could be off doing something useful with their lives.
With that in mind it might surprise you that I spent a long
weekend reading this book especially as I’m hardly perplexed about my Atheism.
To be honest I’m not exactly sure why I picked it up either. I’d actually
forgotten that I’d bought it and had only recently rediscovered it ‘lost’
between two piles of books. In a moment of weakness I thought I’d see if
Professor Walters could actually produce a readable and interesting book on a
subject that I had basically given up on. Surprisingly he did – which is why I
managed to read its 177 pages without throwing my hands up in
horror/exasperation or being bored to tears. He did elicit a few eye rolls
(especially when he talked about a rapprochement between theists and atheists)
but overall managed to be very even handed in his treatment of both sides which
was honestly refreshing these days. At times I did feel he was giving the theist
too much leeway but then, within a few pages, I felt that he might be giving
the atheists a bit too much credit. If I had to place him on one side or the
other I’d plump for him (just) being on the side of the atheists as he
effectively called into question every theist argument for God rightly saying
that they are all inadequate and some are so seriously flawed as to be embarrassing.
He also rightly pointed out that there is no killer argument on the atheist
side that shows beyond doubt the God does not or cannot exist. Their arguments
are better (both he and I believe) but they are not the last word.
I can’t say that the last section ruined things for me but
he did call into question his apparent impartiality by proposing and calling
for a constructive dialogue between the two sides of the debate – over the
apparent common ground of spirituality. He was very careful to draw
similarities between theistic beliefs and the natural wonder and sometimes awe
we all feel sometimes just by experiencing the world/universe that we’re all
part of. Whilst I acknowledge that such a thing exists I think that he’s making
a fundamental mistake of attempting to compare things that, on the face of it,
could be seen as the same – or very similar – things but are in fact quite
different. Awe at the universe might be a factor in religious feeling but I don’t
believe that a meaningful relationship between the two opposing sides can be
built on such a thing.
5 comments:
I've never been particularly enamoured of god arguments, pro or con. Even when I was still a theist, i found them lacking.
I too once hoped to see theists and non-theists have healthy dialogues, and they happen sometimes, but there is always a disconnect.
Mike said: I've never been particularly enamoured of god arguments, pro or con.
Even a good one, if such a thing existed, would still only be a good argument and actual *proof* of not that much... [grin]
Mike said: I too once hoped to see theists and non-theists have healthy dialogues, and they happen sometimes, but there is always a disconnect.
They live in two very different worlds where the same objects mean very different things. I've seen debates *start* well (or at least with the best of intentions) but quickly get bogged down or degenerate into childish point scoring. At which point I leave.....
Yep, I stay away from most of those discussions these days, and try to focus on the fact that we all need to figure out some way to get along on this big blue ball in space.
Mike said: we all need to figure out some way to get along on this big blue ball in space.
If only we could. I do have the feeling that such an accommodation is simply beyond us.
As long as people continue to value other things over human life, that is true.
Post a Comment