Just Finished Reading: The Sympathizer by Viet Thanh Nguyen (FP: 2015) [495pp]
Always an outsider. Always. He didn’t even question it any more, it was who he was. But knowing who he was and what he was turned out to be a kind of power. Once he accepted his position, his fate, he was free. Maybe he was even home no matter how far he travelled. It started the very day he was born a bastard – the product of lust between a western priest and a Vietnamese villager. As a bastard and a mixed blood he would never be accepted except by the mother who bore him. But he was smart and learnt quickly – both the ways and the words of the west and the truth of the coming Communist Revolution. He was an ideal infiltrator into the security apparatus of South Vietnam one able to mimic the South’s love of all things modern and American. He even fooled the fabled CIA into employing him. He was also ideal to leave his country on the Fall of Saigon and flee to the west as a refugee. There, embedded within the last remnants of South Vietnam’s power structure, he could observe and report on their plans for a triumphal return to power. Always on the outside, always looking in. Outside his country, outside his patriotic duty to the South, outside his belief in the Communist Party and outside his blood bond friendship. Always outside.
I remember watching the Vietnam War on the nightly news
broadcasts and distinctly remember the last days of Saigon and the rushed
helicopter flights onto waiting, and sometimes fleeing, ships beyond the shores
of that embattled country. I hadn’t really considered what happened afterwards
to the many native Vietnamese and children of American soldiers who fled when
the regime in the South fell in April 1975. Here we are presented with several
examples of how people survived in the new world of America through the eyes of
someone who was all too aware of what had happened and what was to come. Unsurprisingly,
given the amount of awards this book either won or was nominated for, this is a
very well written work. The sense of isolation is as palpable as the oppressive
atmosphere of Saigon in the summer time without the relief of monsoon rain. The
dramatic escape from Saigon was adrenaline pumping stuff and full of tragedy as
well as hope. Everything felt very real including the almost overwhelming
feeling of loss as the narrator and his ex-General started to come to terms
with their situation. Our sympathies were definitely fully engaged with his
plight and those of his blood brother who had literally lost everything. Yet…..
Although I found the first few hundred pages both affective and interesting my
overall appreciation began to wane. I think a large part of the problem was
that, apart from the narrator, almost none of the characters were particularly
likable. The General and his wife were arrogant dreamers who I actively
disliked and their rebellious daughter wasn’t much better. The Vietnamese
reporter was likable enough but had too small and too short a role to play.
Despite the strength of the main character his presence wasn’t enough, in my
mind, to hang the entire narrative on. The plot, once they left South Vietnam,
I thought wandered semi-aimlessly with the plotting of the Southern regime’s
return (honestly barely touched upon) and a side plot as the narrator ‘assisted’
a movie director with his Vietnam War movie with added ‘authenticity’. Again
interesting enough but I did wonder more than once, apart from causing the
narrator to look back on his own reality in contrast to the US fictionalised version
of the war, what the point was. I think what I’m trying to say is that I just
couldn’t ‘connect’ with the book except on the more superficial ‘interesting
and well written’ level. It engaged my intellect but only occasionally did it
engage my emotions.
Rather oddly one of the reviews on the front of my copy said
that the book was ‘tremendously funny’. That’s certainly not the tone I took
from it! The book was, in many places, anything but funny (the hilarious squid
episode aside!!). Apart from the combat, death, guilt, grief, torture and two
rapes (one real during an interrogation and one simulated in the movie) there
was little space I think for humour – at least in my reading! Although I can
kind of see why it won so many awards I can’t say that I enjoyed it as much as
other books I’ve read this year. It’s certainly worth a read, I give it that,
but it won’t be in my ‘must read’ list for 2021.
Awards:
Winner of the 2016 Pulitzer Prize for Fiction
Winner of the 2016 Edgar Award for Best First Novel
Winner of the 2016 Andrew Carnegie Medal for Excellence in
Fiction
Winner of the 2015 Centre for Fiction First Novel Prize
International IMPAC Dublin Literary Awards Best Book
(nominee)
4 comments:
probably the average sense of humor deteriorated over the last four years...
I loved this book and have read it twice. I got more of what he was doing with the story the second time. I think it has a unique kind of satirical humor and I felt the main character pretty deeply. The Vietnam War loomed large in my early adult years so perhaps that is why I connected so much with the tale.
@ Mudpuddle: Almost definitely! [grin]
@ Judy: I re-read your review after posting this. I went in thinking it was a gritty war/aftermath/espionage thriller. I didn't read it as a satire. I'm not sure if that'd make much of a difference - although its difficult to be sure.... I think it must have been the connection (or lack thereof) so I failed to engage. I certainly didn't hate it. It was a good solid read in many ways. I think it may just have been too far outside my experience to relate to very much. Dunno.... [muses]
I also enjoyed this book and read it twice. It was one of my favorites the year it was released in paperback. The outsider theme is what I remember best about the book, along with the harrowing scenes that you mentioned.
Post a Comment