Just Finished Reading: Paris Reborn – Napoleon III, Baron Haussmann, and the Quest to Build a Modern City by Stephane Kirkland (FP: 2013) [292pp]
If there is one thing that History teaches – apart from the fact that we humans do not learn from History – is that things are invariably contingent. There is no Fate, no Destiny and no Plan. Bullets miss their intended target, winds change direction at just the wrong time (or just the right one), and messages are delayed, lost, misread or ignored in the heat of battle. Such things are woven into the fabric of human history and are one of the things that make predicting things such a headache. Looking back, and having a grasp of the minutiae of unfolding events, we can see that things often viewed in hindsight as inevitable are anything but – things could always have been different. This applies to individual lives, countries, battles and cities.
Paris, now rightly regarded as a world city, a city of light
and one of the urban wonders of the world, was anything but in the early 19th
century. Growing organically without much in the way of planning or foresight
it was starting to fall victim to its own success. Small changes had been made
over time to alleviate problems here and there and opportunities to upgrade or
demolish buildings had been taken in the event of fires or other disasters but
it was time for something more radical. But first a vision was required and
someone powerful enough to drive that vision forward. Step forward the unlikely
possessor of that vision - Charles Louis Napoléon Bonaparte, nephew of the more
famous Napoléon Bonaparte we all learnt about in history class. Vision he had,
but power and influence he most certainly lacked. Luckily for him (and arguably
the world) he was about to be ‘used’ by a political fixer by being installed as
President of France in 1848 and, after his short and undistinguished term in
office, then being replaced by said ‘fixer’. Unfortunately Charles Louis had
other ideas and executed a palace coup becoming Napoleon III – Emperor of the
French – in 1852. Power, influence were now his along with the vision of
creating a city fit for an Empire. Appointing Georges-Eugène Haussmann (later
Baron Haussmann) as Prefect of the Seine to co-ordinate the project the
wholesale overhaul of the city could begin.
3 comments:
i recall reading an account of how Hausmann "destroyed" the colorful old city... all pov, i guess... the universe is only a 3-d billiard table, anyway...
Was Hausmann the Robert Moses of his day?
@ Mudpuddle: The project certainly destroyed several low-rent areas that had been considered 'colourful'. No one really cared (apart from the residents) when they were 'bulldozed' though. It was only when the works moved into the higher class areas that the project got serious push-back.
@ James: It seems that way. Haussmann had multiple 'hats' too and wasn't a trained architect or engineer but used both to get his overall plan completed. It looks like both were equally controversial too! I'll be reading about New York/Robert Moses in future....
Post a Comment