About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Monday, October 03, 2022


Just Finished Reading: Burning the Books – A History of Knowledge Under Attack by Richard Ovenden (FP: 2020) [233pp] 

Burning books or the destruction of archives neither started, nor unfortunately ended, with the 1930’s in central Europe. Even recently, in the war in Ukraine, we have witnessed the deliberate targeting of cultural centers and libraries by Russian missiles. This is, as it always was, a well-worn method of attempting to erase a people, a belief or a culture from history. Without records for future generations to discover and appreciate it is that much harder for communities to know their own past. Without historical anchors to bind them it is much more likely that cultures, beliefs or entire peoples become adrift in time. 

From the destruction of the Library of Alexandria (which was actually two libraries and didn’t burn down in a single tragic event) to the religious book burnings during the 30 Years War and the Reformation, from the removal of archives in former colonial outposts – partially through blind bureaucracy and partially to deny former colonies evidence for legal recourse – to artillery strikes on libraries during the breakup of Yugoslavia, to the casual neglect of libraries throughout the world as cash-strapped governments cut funds and cut again on what many see as easily disposable activities. Even today on our nightly news we see those who often do not use libraries attempting to force the removal of books to restrict the dissemination of ideas or narratives they deem inappropriate or inconvenient. The symbolic, at least, burning of books it with us today and quite probably in our own town. 

Of course, being a book lover of many, many years, the very idea of deliberately destroying books and most especially old rare or priceless books – no matter their content – is deeply repugnant to me. If a book holds a belief system I do not subscribe to, if a book contains details or opinions that I do not share, if a book portrays lifestyles or behaviours that are different to mine, I do not expect, advocate or demand their destruction. To my way of thinking that’s like asking me to describe the smell of the number 9 – my mind kind of slides off the idea and just can’t ‘lock on’ to it. But such ideas, sometimes all too successful although thankfully often anything but, are nothing new and are universal. But so is, as the author points out repeatedly, the idea that books, ideas, culture should be preserved for all mankind. Tales of those who fight against book banning or book burning are sprinkled throughout this often-compelling narrative, stories of those who hid sacred Jewish texts during the dark times in Occupied Europe, stories of librarians, firefighters and civilians who braved fire, and exploding shells to rescue priceless historical artifacts from museums and cultural archives as well as publishers who continue publishing such works despite the threat of fines, prison or worse. Definitely an interesting, depressing but also uplifting work (as well as a warning!) for all bibliophiles.   

5 comments:

VV said...

I also find book banning and burning repugnant. It’s the ultimate in narrow-minded ignorance. People threatened by ideas, people who want to control other people”s access to ideas and knowledge are usually the ones screaming the loudest about their own rights. “Book challenges are more common than ever. Between July 1, 2021 and March 31, 2022 alone, there were 1,586 book bans in 86 school districts across 26 states—affecting more than two million students, according to PEN America, a nonprofit that advocates for free speech.” PEN America - https://pen.org

Stephen said...

I suppose I'm an odd librarian in that I find screaming about 'banned books' to be risible. Schools and libraries have limited resources, both in terms of space and money to buy books. They therefore have to exercise discretion as to which books to buy. A library not buying a book, or concerned parents wanting a library to remove a book that was purchased with the taxpayers' money, does not constitute "banning". If a library refuses to stock Fifty Shades of Grey or Mein Kampf, or whatever, sexually frustrated middle aged women and wannabe edgelords who are really into Hugo Boss can still find those books out in the wild -- at other libraries, commercial bookstores, at friend's homes, etc. The books will even have added appeal for their aura of naughtiness! "Banning" is when some massive authority actively prevents people from accessing the item, even through the market -- as Amazon has done with some books, and as states across the world do with books and other media. Besides -- public institutions that purchase media with taxpayer money must do so in accordance with said public's values -- otherwise, they're faithless servants.

CyberKitten said...

@ V V: It does always make me smile (ironically) when those who have shouted loudest about 'cancel culture' turn around and demand that a whole list of books they don't want *their* children reading should be removed so that other parents children also can't read them. Suddenly freedom and personal responsibility/choice isn't in play anymore. Much like the 'my body my choice' mask response doesn't apply to abortions.... I think there's a word for it... it's on the tip on my tongue... I think it begins with H.

@ Stephen: I agree that libraries do indeed have (all too often very) limited resources and can't acquire every book published. Libraries also serve the needs and aspirations of the local community. I'm sure that the books in rural libraries are often very different from inner city libraries. I also agree that books can be bought (if you can afford them) or borrowed from friends if they have a book you'd like to read and are happy to lend it to you. But, that's very different from books being taken off shelves that have already been bought and are already borrowed by many because they 'offend' the sensibilities of a few or of those temporarily in power.

These days it is probably impossible to totally remove a non-rare book and prevent anyone from reading it. But it is possible to restrict and reduce access to a book especially to those who can't just go on Amazon and have it delivered. I'm certainly not proposing that every book ever published should be available to everyone any time they want it. That kind of resource allocation can probably only exist in a post-scarcity society. But I also don't think that books should be taken off shelves because they might possibly offend someone/a small percentage of the population or get them thinking about topics differently. If you don't like the sound of a book don't read it or, if you're that way inclined, try and prevent your kids from reading it (good luck with that one by the way) but don't think that gives you the right to stop me from picking up a copy from the library to see what all the fuss is about.

Sarah @ All The Book Blog Names Are Taken said...

I was counting on you liking it, since I have already picked it up from the library.

I will never not cry when I think about everything lost at Alexandria.

CyberKitten said...

It's difficult to imagine what has been lost from the Greek & Roman world. We've only got fragments of and comments about some works by really famous authors. It's weird.