Just Finished Reading :
The Polish Officer by Alan Furst
In 1939, as the might of the German Army descends on Poland ,
Intelligence officer Alexander de Milja is given a new mission. He is to make
his way to Paris
to assist in the creation of a Polish Intelligence unit dedicated to expelling
the Germans from his country. Within months France to is over run and de Milja
is left behind in the confused evacuation. Left to his own devices he puts
together a rag-bag collection of misfits to continue the struggle. Contacted by
agents of the Polish government in exile – now based in London – de Milja is
tasked to aid the fledgling French Resistance in any way he can and pass on any
information to the British. When he discovers information that the Germans
intend a cross-channel invasion of England he takes direct action to
aid RAF attacks on the invasion staging posts. As a reward for his heroism he
is sent into the belly of the beast to help the Russians fight off a German
invasion of their territory. At this point he can not but wonder if he will
ever see an end to the fighting or if he will live to see his country free
again.
As some of you will know, Alan Furst is one of my top
authors. I like to hold off reading his books so that I can savour them all the
more. Unfortunately, I found to my surprise that I did not enjoy this book as
much as I had been anticipating. It’s not that it’s a bad book – or at least
not by any general standard. It’s just that I felt that it wasn’t up to Furst’s
usually very high standards. It took me a while to get into which is unusual
for his stories. Maybe it was me? I can, from time to time, almost give up on
reading and sometimes need to almost force myself to turn the pages. This
wasn’t one of those times but maybe I had a tinge of that feeling in the back
of my mind. Whatever the issue was I just couldn’t loose myself in this
particular novel. This wasn’t actually helped when I spotted what I think is an
uncharacteristic mistake in historical accuracy. When describing a particularly
dramatic attack on a French coastal harbour by elements of the RAF he
described in gripping detail Blenheim bombers coming in at 50 feet causing
havoc in the massed German invasion fleet. Now the Bristol Blenheim was one of
my favourite early WW2 aircraft and I built several models of it in my
childhood. I was, to say the least, ‘pumped’ by the scene he described and
could see it clearly in my minds eye. Then, on page 198, he made his error. Describing
the second attack on the port, this time from high level, he mentions that the
craft are probably Lancaster
bombers. Now most normal people would read that and move on blissfully unaware
but I, as you may have noticed, am not most people. The section of the RAF
attack was headed 7th September (in 1940 that is). So the problem I
had was that the first flight of a Lancaster
bomber was on 9th January 1941 and didn’t enter service with the RAF
Bomber Command until early 1942. Although this certainly didn’t ruin the book
for me, it did disappoint me and coloured my appreciation of the rest of the
novel. Yes, I’m a pedant. I freely admit this. But this error was quite
fundamental. You might even call it a schoolboy error. Either Mr Furst or his
researcher did a pretty sloppy job on that one. It detracted from my enjoyment
of the book and will probably affect my enjoyment of his future novels. This is
a real shame as I am enjoyed his previous books immensely and still enjoyed
this one too. I’m going to do my best not to read his next book looking for
errors but that is now a real danger. Furst fans out there should not avoid
this book. It has many, many fine attributes usually associated with his work.
Just be aware that his historical accuracy halo has most definitely slipped
here.
4 comments:
Hmmm, I left a comment, but it seems to have gotten lost in cyber space. I just said that I can understand how one little fault like that get bug you enough where it becomes distracting. I've had books like that before and if the mistakes are too many, I just stop reading it.
Well, I only noticed the one glaring error [grin]. There might have been more and I've definitely become sensitized to future mistakes....
But I agree. If there are too many errors I'd definitely stop reading.
Whether reading a book or watching a movie, a big part of the enjoyment is contingent on suspension of disbelief. If you notice things that are factually incorrect, it's a big deal and no matter how you might try to move past it, it definitely sours the whole experience.
dbackdad said: Whether reading a book or watching a movie, a big part of the enjoyment is contingent on suspension of disbelief.
Most definitely. Once you loose the immersion it's very difficult to get back.
Post a Comment