My Favourite Movies: Source Code
Well, I guess you can’t get much more up to date than this
choice. Source Code came out here in April this year. The trailer looked
interesting enough and I’ve liked Jake Gyllenhall since I first saw him in
Donnie Darko. I did have a few misgivings after seeing previous films that
tried to look at incidents from various viewpoints (for example the terrible
Vantage Point) but then I thought of Déjà vu (starring Denzil Washington) and
thought it might be OK.
OK, spoiler time. If you haven’t seen this movie and intend
watching it on DVD anytime soon I’d stop reading now and skip to my
Motivational poster on Tuesday….. So, for the rest of you here’s a basic
synopsis of the plot:
Gyllenhall is army helicopter pilot Captain Colter Stevens
who, inexplicably at first, finds himself on a train without any memory of
getting there. Across from him is a very pretty girl (played by the lovely
Michelle Monaghan) who appears to be in mid conversation with him. As he
struggles to understand what’s going on around him he catches a glimpse of his
face in the window – and it isn’t his face. Just as he’s beginning to realise
that something very strange is going on the train explodes and he’s suddenly in
what looks like a space capsule. At this point totally disoriented he is talked
down by an Air force officer in the shape of Vera Farmiga. After some
reluctance she tells him that he is part of a special project which can send
him back in time to a specific location for 8 minutes where he inhabits someone
else’s body. His mission is to find out who bombed the train and to get this
information back to the authorities before the bomber can strike again. But he
can only do this in 8 minute slices at the end of which he dies, again and
again and again until he finds out the information they want.
Now this could have easily been a very tedious film indeed –
even if the runtime is only an amazingly short 89 minutes. But several things
make it far from tedious. Although we are forced to watch as the same 8 minutes
unfound, each time with an explosive conclusion, we learn different things each
time around. We learn more about Colter, what happened to him before he first
appeared on the train and we watch as he develops a relationship both with his
Air force ‘handler’ and with the woman sitting in front of him on the train. We
also see him trying to change the outcome of the explosion even though he is
told repeated that such a thing is impossible. That for me was one of the most
interesting aspects of the movie. Despite all of the techno-babble that the
Director of the project used to ‘explain’ things to Colter he still tried to
change things and save the lives of the people on the train knowing that their
deaths had already happened. There is even some talk about changing things in
alternate realities (though the story isn’t explicit about this and doesn’t
really follow this up). What is surprising is what actually happens at the end
of the film. I won’t be giving too much away by saying that Colter succeeds
despite the warnings that he’s wasting time even trying to save people (the
movies tagline: Change the Past – Save the Future kind of telegraphs things
here!) I am, as always, a sucker for a clever film – actually even a film that
tries to be clever but fails despite a good effort. Generally this was such a
clever film. It was a bit heavy handed with the military relationship between
Colter and his handler. It was a bit too obviously post 9/11 – though
interestingly the terrorist is a local nut-job rather than stock Islamists.
About the only thing that disturbed me about the whole thing was what happened
to the original guy that Colter took over? Colter is effectively dead but has
been given a chance to live again in a new body – except that he needs to eject
the previous owner to do so…. And he seems OK with that. Maybe he sees it as
collateral damage or as payment for saving a whole bunch of people on the
train. But no one seems in the least bit bothered that he’s basically just
body-jacked someone. The ethical questions surrounding this are difficult at
best – and completely ignored.
4 comments:
I really enjoyed this when I saw it at the theatre. I don't remember catching the fact that he would have had to highjack the guy's body. I don't think I even thought about that. Now that's got me pondering the possibilities.
I only read as far as the premise -- absolutely fascinating. I like plots that screw with time. (One of my favorite The Next Generation episodes has the Enterprise experiencing the same course of events over and over and over again, every time blowing up and then restarting the sequence with no one the wiser. Eventually deja vu builds up, though, and things get creepy for the characters and fun for us.)
smellincoffee - I agree. I'm big on any time-twisting stories (even non-sci-fi like Sliding Doors and Run, Lola, Run). I just watched the TNG episode you spoke of. I'm working my way through all the episodes on Netflix right now (currently in season 6).
I wanted to see Source Code, but hadn't got the chance yet. For that reason, CK, I skipped most of your review. I'll double-back once I see it. I like the director's other movie, Moon. Plus, he has built-in coolness cred, being David Bowie's son.
Saw Source Code a while back (and Moon before that). Both intriguing; high marks for inventiveness.
I'm just not sure how far I can stretch my suspension of disbelief for these things, but approached with a don't-ask/don't-tell stance it was poignantly entertaining.
Post a Comment