About Me

My photo
I have a burning need to know stuff and I love asking awkward questions.

Monday, March 17, 2014


Just Finished Reading: 1913 – The Year Before the Storm by Florian Illies (FP: 2012)

This has to be one of the strangest books I’ve read in quite a few years. It was also very much not what I had expected it to be. What I had expected was a month by month build up to the outbreak of WW1 with an attempt to understand why Europe fell apart in one of the most destructive conflicts to date. What I got was nothing of the sort!

What the author instead presented us with was a series of snapshots (some of which were eccentric to say the least) of events and personalities in Europe - in particular France and Germany - in the last year before everything went wrong. These events and personalities were, in the main, authors, artists, poets and dreamers many of whom had no connection at all with war, politics or the events of 1914. Among them where Franz Kafka (trying and failing in his long running romantic attachment), Sigmund Freud (and his feud with Jung) and Picasso (with his many lovers and dramatic artistic statements). Central amongst them was the various strands of modernism which competed with each other and universally shocked, outraged or confused everyone not ‘in the know’.

What has any of this to do with the coming war – nothing as far as I could tell…. And yet, there is something that exists between the stories of the various adventures and misadventures of these prominent European citizens (many now long forgotten – indeed many of which I had no knowledge whatsoever). It’s almost as if the story the author wanted to tell couldn’t possibly be told directly. What he wanted to get across was a feeling, something basically indefinable and, he certainly managed part of that. Initially rather confusing this book built, layer on layer, incident by incident and month by month to create a living breathing picture of what it must have been like just before the hammer fell. 1913 was, in all honesty, a very strange place. Massive cultural shifts where taking place that, even without WW1, would still have probably changed everything. Modernism, in all of its myriad forms, was just starting to burst out of the studios and the publishing houses and was starting to have a real impact on people’s lives. The sheer weirdness of this time comes across on every page. It’s almost as if Europe itself was in the throes of a cultural nervous breakdown and had no idea how to resolve things – despite the Freudian and Jungian best attempts to offer a cure (of sorts).

Of course it quickly became apparent that the author had no intention of addressing the question of why Europe tore itself apart for 5 years just 100 years ago. What we are instead presented with is a world that ceased to exist with the assassination and the shot the rang around the world and led to tens of millions of deaths in the mud and blood of battlefields across Europe and the far flung places of long lost Empires. What that world might have become if the fatal bullet had never been fired is a very interesting one but not one that the author even hints at. The world of 1913 is a deeply fascinating one and one that we should weep at its loss. 1914 and what followed on from those tragic years was a human disaster of staggering proportions. The world would never be the same again. There was no going back to the way things had been. The world of 1913 was gone forever and, despite its many faults, we should morn its passing. If nothing else this book has given me a brief glimpse through a dirty window at a very different age. To begin with I really wondered why this quirky volume has become an international best seller. By the time I had read ¼ of the book I began to see why. By the end I was hooked and mesmerised. Magical, wonderful, strange and highly recommended.

8 comments:

VV said...

WWI has a lot of factors leading up to it, that make it all seem inevitable in hindsight. I think I'd like to read this book and see what I could glean from it. Here are some of the factors I cover in my classes: end of the Industrial Revolution, slowing economies, the age of Imperialism, the Spanish-American War (modern steel navy vs. Old World wooden navy, triggering European Arms Race), Social Darwinism, White Man's Burden/Manifest Destiny, nationalism, the division of Africa (Germany gets too little and begins forming the Schliefflen Plan to take a chunk of Europe instead), secret alliances, the dying Ottoman Empire and the subsequent teouble in the Balkans, the assassination of Franz Ferdinand.

CyberKitten said...

V V said: WWI has a lot of factors leading up to it, that make it all seem inevitable in hindsight.

Of course looking backwards lots of thing seem inevitable. But it only takes a few powerful people to do something different for things to change radically.

I'd certainly agree with many of the topics you outlined but I was very intrigued by one of them:

Social Darwinism

Do you mean that nations competed with each other thinking that fitness (in war presumably) meant that they are in some supposedly 'scientific' way superior to their adversaries?

VV said...

The German's really felt superior as a nation. It goes back to before they became the nation of Germany. In the Franco-Prussian War they beat the French National Army, previously seen as the best in Europe, against all odds that said they shouldn't have won. Then they form as a nation and go through two major industrial revolutions becoming the largest steel producer in Europe, not to mention also becoming very wealthy. From their perspective, they did more in 40 years as a nation than France and Britain had done in 100 years. The Germans host the Berlin Conference to be civilized and divide Africa up amongst themselves, and they mostly get shut out. They get three little colonies and France and Britain get the biggest shares. All the signatory nations agreed to this, seeing France and Britain as more capable of controlling the territories, but Germany's pride was hurt. They really saw themselves at the big boys' table as one of the major player nations and felt dissed by the other countries. They go back home and slowly begin planning to take the land they felt they rightly deserved out of Europe if they couldn't have it in Africa. This plan will be the Schleiffen Plan.

CyberKitten said...

So.... basically the Germans where annoyed and churlish adolescents?

Sounds about the right level for world politics and with what's going on ATM nothing much has changed...

Stephen said...

Finally found it! I liked your layered description of it. I didn't warm to it as you did (rather the opposite it: I was drawn in by the absorption first, then grew tired of it), but I daresay it's memorable.

Marianne said...

First of all, thanks for your comment and the link on my review of this book.

You come up with some good comments about the year.

And I agree, the Germans were churlish adolescents but isn't anyone who starts such a stupid war? Look at the present one going on in front of our doorsteps.

In any case, we can see with this book, how people lived back then and what they took for granted. I liked that he mentioned a lot of artists, authors etc. because we often think it's just the politicians who form our politics.

CyberKitten said...

Another book I can recommend which looks at the start of things - from the viewpoint of people at the time - is 1913 – The World before the Great War by Charles Emmerson. Its a fascinating look from the perspective of people who had no idea of what was coming. My review (from back in 2015) is here:

https://cyberkittenspot.blogspot.com/2015/01/just-finished-reading-1913-world-before.html

Marianne said...

Sounds good, thank you.