Just Finished Reading: The Beats – A Very Short Introduction by David Sterritt (FP: 2013) [108pp]
I've encountered 'The Beats' on many occasions over the years – in movies, cultural histories and novels - and have even read a few things by them most notably On The Road by Jack Kerouac and, more recently, a booklet of poetry by Allen Ginsberg but have never really read anything about them until now.
My initial thought that they were essential a precursor to the 'Hippies' on the late 1960's and into the 70's wasn't too far off the mark. The Beats were certainly rebels of their post-WW2 era and talked about and practiced 'free love' and drug use (although this was pre-LSD so the drugs of choice tended to be marijuana, cocaine and heroin) as well as breaking the taboo around homosexuality. The difference in their radical outlook from the Hippies that followed in their wake was that Beatniks tended to be more inward looking and less 'revolutionary' whilst Hippies tended to be much more political and looked to change society in general.
Naturally this slim volume concentrated its focus on the big three Beats – Kerouac, Ginsberg and William S Burroughs. I was at least familiar with the existence of these three figures and was at least somewhat acquainted with their work – in that I knew of it! The other figures mentioned in this volume were universally new to me – Neal Cassady, Gergory Corso, Lawrence Ferlinghetti, Diane di Prima and Gary Snyder. Potted biographies of everyone listed certainly helped me know more about them and appreciate their impact on the Movement.
Much like the Hippies, the Beats tended to be into everything – novels, poetry, music (especially Jazz), art and film. Despite there being only an estimated 150 published authors/poets amongst them the Beats managed to punch well above their cultural weight in part due to the backlash against their countercultural drive. The horror stories (often either made up or exaggerated – although sometimes not!) helped to cement their cool image with youths looking for something to rebel against. A fairly interesting look at an often-forgotten countercultural movement. Reasonable.

2 comments:
I've little desire to read the Beats but I am curious about the movement. Though it was more inward-looking, was there still a political impetus for their rebellion? I can imagine after two world wars, young men might be taking a leery view of authority and be thinking no behavior was off limits.
Apparently the Beats had very few political bones in their bodies - apart from the desire to be left alone and not be bothered by the authorities. Their primary focus seemed to be much more self regarding. Interestingly their belief system of choice (or at least seeming fascination) was Buddhism with a focus on personal growth and exploration - which 'explains' their use of drugs to 'open the mind'. They would have LOVED LSD I'm guessing!
Post a Comment